Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I've noticed recently, when viewing questions that have obviously been asked before, people spend about half of the question trying to explain how the question shouldn't be closed as a duplicate. It comes off like they're just trying to avoid the research.

Examples: Allow a user to edit the text in a UITableView cell.

Is there anything to be done other than continuing to mark them as duplicates?

share|improve this question
Ignore their comments and vote to close them. Eventually they will learn that their impassioned pleas are ineffective. Or they won't, and they'll end up with a low-quality ban. – Aarobot Feb 1 '12 at 3:37
Yes, except that we generally go through great pains to tell people that if they think their problem just isn't quite the same as the one already posted, they're supposed create a new question, link to the not-a-duplicate question, and explain why it's not. Now we're going to just close them anyway. If I recall, the "close as duplicate" was supposed to be a fairly rare occurrence. – Al E. Feb 1 '12 at 5:16
there's a feature-request: Don't close questions where the user has requested that it not be closed – gnat Feb 1 '12 at 9:20

Edit non-relevant text out of the question. Leave in the bits that actually aid good answers ("this other question is different because...")

I went ahead and edited one of the questions you linked to, but left in a bit of relevant information.

share|improve this answer
But only if it really is a duplicate. If it's not, they have a good reason to try and point out the differences. – Bill the Lizard Feb 1 '12 at 3:30
I agree, @Bill, and that's how I tried to edit the question in question. – Michael Petrotta Feb 1 '12 at 3:32

Well, in this specific case I feel like they were giving an explanation, perhaps a valid one, for why their question is not a duplicate. If this is the case I see nothing wrong with it. With the overwhelming number of questions on SO it can be difficult to ask a question that isn't already covered. Explaining why your question isn't just another duplicate might actually be necessary at this point.

If it was just a pointless "plz dnt close" then that's another issue altogether.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .