Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Cancel misclicked flags
Can we have a way to undo a flag?

I flagged a question as not an answer because it (at first) looked like it was a "comment" on the correct answer from the original asker. After further review I could see it was actually an answer, and I wished to cancel my flag request. But there is no mechanism to do that.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Grant Thomas, Andrew Barber, davidsleeps, Gilles, Robert Harvey Feb 8 '12 at 23:10

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Why would you need to? – Robert Harvey Feb 8 '12 at 22:43
possible duplicate of Cancel misclicked flags. There are also a bunch of others‌​. – Grant Thomas Feb 8 '12 at 22:44
1) One has a limited number of flags to use, and 2) I don't want to waste the moderator's time. – alord1689 Feb 8 '12 at 22:44
Bad flags are rare, so they only waste a little bit of the mods' time. I would simply be a little more careful about casting your flags. :) – Robert Harvey Feb 8 '12 at 22:46

Every feature request is evaluated using (more or less) the following criteria:

  1. How much will it cost to implement, and
  2. How much benefit will accrue?

For this particular feature, the cost far outweighs the benefit.

What does a bad flag cost? Nothing to the flagger, not really. The benefit of good flagging is your flags are given a higher priority in the moderator queue. If a user abuses the flag system, and they get a large number of declined flags, their flags will simply not show up in the moderator queue anymore.

Allowing people to cancel their flags, on the other hand, would require writing a whole new subsystem to show you your flags, allow you to check off the one(s) you want dismissed, and write the changes to the database. All this for a very small (it's on the order of 1 percent) number of flags that a bad flagger wouldn't bother to correct anyway.

share|improve this answer
If you simply gave us access to the database, we could do it by hand, and save you the cost of implementation. – Adam Davis Feb 8 '12 at 23:03
@AdamDavis hey, that's a good idea. We should totally do that. – Rebecca Chernoff Feb 8 '12 at 23:13
Since the "whole new subsystem to show you your flags" now exists, perhaps the two criteria are now more evenly balanced? – Lord_Farin Sep 18 '13 at 7:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .