What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

Can we revoke voting privileges from those go through profiles and up-vote or down-vote spam others?

Sure, the system re-sets it, most of the time if it's big enough to catch it, but if we actually add a punishment to the behavior ("If you can't use them properly, don't use them at all"), we might be able to train users who do this better.

share|improve this question
    
You're talking about a separate detection mechanism that relies on how users find what they vote on? E.g., natural discovery through search and internal links is viewed more favorably than going through someone's profile? –  Matthew Read Feb 14 '12 at 21:19
1  
What is the real problem here? And how is the software supposed to detect someone's state of mind? –  Matt Fenwick Feb 14 '12 at 21:23
    
The usual mechanism for dealing with this is to suspend the user temporarily. –  Robert Harvey Feb 14 '12 at 21:29
    
Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/108538 –  Robert Harvey Feb 14 '12 at 21:47
    
I'm just thinking about removing the thing they're abusing, rather than the account access. –  Incognito Feb 14 '12 at 21:52
    
    
I'm new here, so I'm not in the position to judge, but I can easily notice how people abuse the voting system by unnecessary up/down votes. -- But I'm not blame SO since any voting system on the planet may be used wrongly by abusers, this is more about people/users than system itself. –  sysop Feb 14 '12 at 22:12
    
Everyone has their own options on how votes should be cast, @sysop. That's probably the best argument in favor of making them anonymous - once you're able to use peer-pressure to coerce folks to vote a certain way, the results lose most of their meaning. –  Shog9 Feb 14 '12 at 22:17
    
@Shog9 I agree, also compared to other Q/A sites, I believe SO moderation is quite fairly and fast. -- I'm moderator of a CG forum myself and pretty much understand what's going on behind the scene, moderation is not as easy as it look. ;) –  sysop Feb 14 '12 at 22:29

1 Answer 1

up vote 12 down vote accepted

There's no way to build an automated system that can judge intent.

Moderators can and do examine these on a case-by-case basis, and are both willing and able to hand out warnings and suspensions as needed to keep the peace. Suspension temporarily revokes all privileges... I'd say that satisfies your request.

share|improve this answer
    
Revoking all privileges is fine, I was thinking of revoking a subset of all instead. They might be abusing the arrows but they might still contribute something worth-while in that time. If this is what's been decided that's cool. –  Incognito Feb 14 '12 at 23:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .