What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

There's a tag on SO: , which refers to the function print_r() in PHP. Currently , 43 out of 46 questions are also tagged (and one more tagged ).

According to the FAQ, a tag that cannot stand alone in a question should not exist, since this tag is dependant on the tag, it should be removed.

I say kill it! Kill it with fire!

Possible?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Sompuperoo, Al E., Shadow Wizard, Martijn Pieters, nicael Dec 7 at 12:00

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Sompuperoo, Al E., Shadow Wizard, Martijn Pieters, nicael
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
Yes. And the echo tag to go with it (as long as it's paired with php) –  Pëkka Feb 17 '12 at 8:37
2  
Could you explain further why this tag is bad? –  AakashM Feb 17 '12 at 9:36
6  
@AakashM - should there be a tag for every single PHP function? –  Flexo Feb 17 '12 at 9:46
1  
@AakashM edited. But I think woodland already did the explaining. –  Second Rikudo Feb 17 '12 at 12:56
1  
Sending out the signal... Please hold... –  Lix Feb 17 '12 at 13:10
1  
But that's an argument for renaming it to, I don't know, php-print-r or similar, rather than deleting it. And @awoodland the choice isn't between 'none' and 'all'. If there are 40+ questions about this function then why shouldn't there be a tag? –  AakashM Feb 17 '12 at 13:13
2  
@AakashM tags for specific parts of an API feels like a case of can't see the wood for the trees - i.e. getting caught in in the implementation details and missing the big picture –  Flexo Feb 17 '12 at 13:22
1  
Hmm, ok, having done some research I see that print_r is actually just a somewhat uninteresting statement (I thought it might be something as exciting as, say, ls ). Objection withdrawn, although I think I'm still more tag-inclusionist than most people round here... –  AakashM Feb 17 '12 at 13:36

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Sigh. We don't need a tag for every single function in every single programming language. Most of the questions in are "why does it look like that" and "how do I parse the output." A few were about using it to assist in debugging.

As such, it's now gone. I cleaned up some horrible tagging along the way, like adding appropriate debugging tags.

While nuking, I discovered and , which has around 46 questions. I've nuked , as it only had 4 questions, but I've left alone when it wasn't paired with . It should also be nuked, but that'll be a different discussion. Most of the questions are probably going to be about debugging (or, worse, parsing output... sigh).

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .