What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

I made an edit action and I know it's waiting peer review in some queue.

But I found I'm wrong. I want to cancel the edit action.

In this case, any review would be waste of time.

And what's worse, it might pass the review if the reviewer is not careful enough.

So is there any reason why the cancel is not available here?

share|improve this question
    
Linking to the suggested edit is a good way to get it reviewed faster from meta users. ;) –  animuson Feb 24 '12 at 5:26
    
Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/80933/… –  Cody Gray Feb 24 '12 at 6:00
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Edits placed in the review queue require two users with the editing privilege to approve it, which means that even if one user isn't careful enough, chances are the second one is.

I say don't worry about it—if it's drastically incorrect, the edit will be rejected. If it's something that the reviewer can fix, they will improve it. What happens in that case is your edit gets accepted, but the reviewer is directed to the edit screen to improve your revision. It's a quick process so you have nothing to worry about.

The fact of the matter is that the editing system doesn't need to be complicated further for users who don't have the privilege already. Like I said above, if it's absolutely wrong, it will be rejected—otherwise, it will be approved by users (and it's good to trust each others' judgement) or improved.

share|improve this answer
2  
But more or less, it bothered 2 guys. And it need not to. –  Ade YU Feb 24 '12 at 5:30
    
And I don't want to gain any reputation in that edit. –  Ade YU Feb 24 '12 at 5:31
    
@AdeYU: If there's nothing else worthwhile or substantive in the edit, then it will be rejected, and you won't get the reputation. If it's helpful except for one part, then it will be improved and you'll get the reputation, but fairly, for contributing the good parts. This works itself out. –  Purag Feb 24 '12 at 5:32
1  
Thanks. I understand it's gonna be OK. And my question is why. Why the site doesn't want me to cancel my edit when I find it is wrong? Why the site bothers 2 other guys to reject my wrong edit, which I myself know is wrong? –  Ade YU Feb 24 '12 at 5:38
    
@AdeYU: Because this is a community-oriented website. What you may think is wrong might actually be totally correct. The input from other users is what this site thrives on, so it's a very successful method. –  Purag Feb 24 '12 at 5:39
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .