Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

According to What markdown formatting features are available for Bounty remarks? only "mini"-markdown is enabled for bounty text. I just posted a bounty over on Add an option to recall moved questions, where I had composed a remark text that looked like this:

I'd like to see reconsideration of this declined request. (I found this question while composing my own version of it.) As a user with close votes, I can review and reverse any other closing, but not migration. This seems asymmetrical at best, and perhaps even unbalanced: why should four* users have the ability to shove a question off a site without possibility of retraction, when five users can't even irrevocably close a question on-site?

I don't believe that "Just raise a flag" is good enough as an answer, since moderators frequently state that they prefer to see consensus before taking possibly disputable action. Raising a flag just pits a single user's opinion against five others'. The standard process of collecting five "reopen" votes seems like the ideal way to indicate the desired kind of consensus.

Related: Should it be possible to reopen migrated questions?
Allow diamond moderators to reverse question migrations?

Note especially Shog9's answer on the second, expressing the opinion that mods shouldn't unmigrate generally.

*number of votes required for migration

Note the paragraphs that make this legible instead of the wall-of-text currently present in the bounty box.

Could the bounty remarks display please be upgraded to "small"-markdown, so that such line breaks are preserved?

share|improve this question
...I don't think you're supposed to write this much. – Cody Gray Mar 1 '12 at 19:31
@Cody: Well, I suppose that may be true, but given that this many characters are allowed, I assumed that they'd be at least somewhat nicely formatted. My other option for adding my own words to the idea are to pretty drastically edit the post (tacking something like this on to the end), and I'm not sure about the advisability of that -- it's still got the OP's name on it, after all. – Josh Caswell Mar 1 '12 at 19:33
I wish we could either add paragraph breaks or shorten the field. Because this is eyeball-numbing, and I suspect the poster didn't realize in advance. – Monica Cellio Jul 11 '13 at 0:58
@MonicaCellio: exactly. Nor did I realize that before posting. – Stephan Kolassa May 23 at 12:54

You can enter 3000 characters when creating a bounty. Forcing all of that into a single paragraph is not useful.

Additionally, even small blocks of text can be clearer and easier to read if they are split up into paragraphs.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .