What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 122 Stack Exchange communities.

There are many plugins which while not on their own could achieve this, like infinite scroll. The idea would be that while a user was answering a question, rather than just putting up a banner saying to reload the page. instead you could have a different request which grabbed the new answers and plugged them into the page so you can see the new answers as you type.

As the answer section is at the bottom of the page you could have the issue of it disappearing from below the cursor as new answers were added, but this could be easily solved with the scrollTop property.

You would probably still want a notification that new content had been added but it would not need to be so obtrusive, you could use a nice fade-in / fade out effect which requires no interaction to keep the user informed.

You could even further extend this to comments and edits, so the user could see the comments appear to their answer as they appear, so edits can be made promptly. Though this last part is less of an annoyance than having to move your focus from the question you are answering to click a link to update the content.

Edit: OK, there appears to have been a number of comments that seem to imply that I was suggesting a huge interruption to the workflow of the user, I was not. I was instead trying to suggest the process be made more streamlined and not interrupt the user with new posts, i.e. not have a notification requiring action.

Stack-overflow already has an instant notification (well recent changes) with the message that appears at the top of the page. What I was suggesting was to do away with that or not require interaction, just update the posts. I also was not suggesting a chat like functionality, I realize there is a section for that already. What I would say is many web usability books, taking just 1 of the top of my head "Don't Make Me Think!: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability" by Steve Krug talks about systems should be making the lives of the users easier not harder. It may not seem like much to automate a step, but the benefits of the user not having to take their attention off the thing they are writing to click something, sure you can still notify just don't interrupt.

As to how, this is a huge community of highly skilled individuals. Does anyone think that this is an insurmountable problem?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

instead you could have a different request which grabbed the new answers and plugged them into the page so you can see the new answers as you type.

No way. I do not want to be interrupted while I'm typing my answer, especially not by a long answer or a bunch of FGITW answers all suddenly showing up and pushing the textarea down and messing with what I'm doing.

The main purpose of having a clickable link is so that I can decide when I'm ready to see the new answers that were submitted.

Auto-update is definitely not feasible for edits either (posts are miniature wikis, not whiteboards).

Remember that Stack Exchange Q&A is not supposed to be a real-time thing. Not everything has to be Ajaxified. If you want Ajax auto-update goodness, go to a chat room.

share|improve this answer
1  
This is one of the best answers I've read on Meta in a long time. Mainly because I very strongly agree with it. –  Cody Gray Mar 1 '12 at 19:11
    
Sorry, I seem to have confused you. What I was suggesting was the opposite of what you seem to be getting from this. I absolutely don't want the user to be interrupted, especially with a link saying stop what you are doing and update. What I was suggesting was a silent update in the background to fill in the new answers as you type and should not interrupt the flow of writing. True, the chat room is a great place for instant update, but what do you mean "Stack Exchange Q&A is not supposed to be a real-time thing" of course it is, you want to get an answer as quickly as possible. –  kamui Mar 2 '12 at 9:15
1  
@kamui: How, pray tell, would new answers be filled in without interrupting the flow of writing? And you're sorely mistaken: Stack Exchange is about getting good answers, not instant answers. Not every 30-second answer is a good answer. There's such a thing as effort, and it has to be put into not only questions, but also answers. If you're asking questions and expecting us to answer as soon as possible, you're probably just going to end up wasting our time and yours. –  BoltClock's a Unicorn Mar 2 '12 at 9:24
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .