What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Lately (on Server Fault at least) we've been seeing many tag wiki edits where people copy and paste content from other websites without the slightly bit of rewriting. Every site I've checked out so far has a copyright statement that disallows plagiarism, most simply require attribution, but some outright prohibit copying of their content.

It would be really helpful if a large red/white box appeared under the blue/white "What are tag wikis?" box when a paste operation is detected in the edit box. The text of the warning would be a quick reminder that copied content is usually copyrighted and the user need to check that out, and provide attribution where it's due.

I'd like to keep this as simply and unobtrusive as possible, there's plenty of people who play by the rules, and I wouldn't want them to be discouraged at all. But as stated, it's become more of an issue as people want the extra reputation points from edit suggestions.

share|improve this question
    
Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/102314/…. I don't think it's so much people after rep (dumping WP into tag wikis only gives you +4 at most when you can easily get more on an answer) as badge seekers (unfortunate side effect of Research Assistant) and misguided editors (I've seen plenty of WP dumps from 20k-ers before the RA badge existed). –  Gilles Mar 2 '12 at 16:07
    
Maybe the amount of rep required to add text to a wiki needs to get bumped. –  Won't Mar 2 '12 at 16:12
2  
@Won't What purpose would that serve? Our wikis are a pretty desolate and empty place most of the time. It's reviewing that should be done more strictly. –  slhck Mar 2 '12 at 16:23
    
@Gilles That could be the case too; though almost all of the WP rips I've seen come from people <1k Rep. Regardless, it'd certainly be nice if something happened when people pasted content. –  Chris S Mar 2 '12 at 16:42
    
@slhck: Usually, rep limits exist in order to prevent idiots from doing bad things... –  Won't Mar 2 '12 at 16:48
    
@Won't Sure, but if you can still suggest crappy edits, chances are someone approves them. No matter how much rep they have. What's the current rep required for suggesting tag wiki changes, actually? Couldn't find it in /privileges. –  slhck Mar 2 '12 at 17:20
1  
@slhck: No idea. I'm just the janitor... –  Won't Mar 2 '12 at 17:28
    
The "Large Warning" is the Reject button. Click it. –  Cody Gray Mar 2 '12 at 21:09
    
@CodyGray Yeah; that really doesn't discourage people in the first place though; and now we've wasted someone else's time too. –  Chris S Mar 2 '12 at 21:56
    
It discourages them eventually. If you submit too many edits that are rejected, you're banned from suggesting edits for a week. And if you pick the cookie-cutter reject reason, hopefully the user will learn something during that time. –  Cody Gray Mar 2 '12 at 22:04
3  
I see these all the time on Stack Overflow. I try to reject them, but in many cases two other people come along and cast approve votes. (In fact, I was just complaining in chat a moment ago about a specific case where that happened.) Unfortunately, history has shown that determined people are very, very good at ignoring warnings and help text, no matter how large and obtrusive you make them. –  Pops May 4 '12 at 18:15
2  
@PopularDemand - I've been seeing the same thing on SO lately. I wonder if tag wikis need 3 or 5 approvals, or have a single "Plagiarized" flag kill the edit, because people seem to just shotgun approve them. –  LittleBobbyTables Aug 3 '12 at 12:52
    
@LittleBobbyTables you may be interested in my recent post Is there an actual "accept ALL the suggested edits" problem? –  Pops Aug 3 '12 at 16:21
    
@PopularDemand - Turns out I am! –  LittleBobbyTables Aug 3 '12 at 18:21

1 Answer 1

I think the problem is two-fold:

  1. You have people who simply copy and paste text from a web page without properly attributing it
  2. You have people who breeze through the review page and accept tag wiki edits without verifying them first.

Not only would a message to users when pasting text in be ideal, but possibly the approval method for tag wikis should be changed to a combination of:

  1. A single "Plagiarized" rejection will reject the wiki edit
  2. Three, four or five acceptance votes are required to approve a wiki edit

Furthermore, people who are continually flagged for plagiarized content should be suspended from editing tag wikis for a period of time.

share|improve this answer
2  
And since I've posted this, I've rejected three more tag wikis for plagiarizing, only to have 10K+ members approve them. Sigh –  LittleBobbyTables Aug 3 '12 at 13:55
    
pls see this question meta.stackexchange.com/questions/190665/… I had one reviewer reject my wiki edit for plagairism, it was approved, however under the suggestion of a single reject, it would've been rejected and unjustifiably. I am as equally frustrated as you, as it seems people are not paying attention in either direction –  user223277 Jul 27 '13 at 14:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .