Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The problem is that once you downvote a post, the odds that you constantly check for improvements to reverse the downvote of the post are close to nonexistent.

I think that by implementing the following suggestions will drastically increase the willing to improve the poor posts:

  • Add a section with a list of all the downvotes posts that have been edited after you downvoted them
  • Consider making minor changes to the vote-locking system to allow more flexibility on downvoted posts (that are edited after your downvote)
  • Create a new badge for vote-reviewing X number of posts on your downvote list

To successfully 'vote-review' a post, you will have to chose between:

  1. Remove the downvote
  2. Upvote
  3. Leave the downvote

Once you correctly review a post, it will will disappear from your list.

Also, the name for the badge could be something that suggests a second chance was given

share|improve this question
Two counterpoints: Edits bump the post, giving it more eyeballs and (if it has improved) votes to counter the old ones; and there's something to be said for letting someone who posted something not great to take a downvote hit and make sure the lesson sticks. I'm not saying this is a bad idea, in fact I would personally like to be able to review posts edited after I've downvoted. I'm just not sure the current way is much of a problem. – Matthew Read Mar 4 '12 at 2:05
What exactly would be the criteria for this badge? I've only seen a general idea proposed, which is good, but you haven't really mentioned what the badge is for. Just reviewing your posts that you previously downvoted isn't really badge-worthy. – animuson Mar 4 '12 at 2:43
@animuson well, like all badges, they are just an incentive to make us do things we wouldn't normally do without them. And about the criteria, I will think how to improve it and be more descriptive, for now I will focus on the main idea – ajax333221 Mar 4 '12 at 2:49
I've often thought that getting a buddy to put a -1 on a question would be a good way to get reputation and answers -- it stands out in the question list, gets people to look at it -- and some might pity vote back to zero once they see it's a reasonable question after all. Just a theory... – sarnold Mar 5 '12 at 11:53
I really like this idea, I think it encourages high quality Q&A. And it discourages drive by down voting.. I also had a thought that @downvoters in the comments could act as a notification to the people who downvoted while maintaining anonymity.. that way you could be asking people to re-review EDIT : D'oh the suggestion is already out there ;-) :… – gordatron Apr 25 '12 at 9:52
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Questions that are edited are automatically bumped to the top of the front page. That's how we give them more exposure.

When I downvote a post, I leave a comment that explains how the post can be improved, and I go do something else. Later, I review all comments I leave; this takes me back to the post I downvoted. If the user improves their post, I remove my downvote.

The best solution is to carefully compose a new question completely, before you post it. Most users who post marginal questions never bother to improve them.

share|improve this answer
I never thought of commenting to later go back! This is really a neat trick :). It would take me some time to write something contributive so it isn't spam, but certainly this is much less time compared to search them manually – ajax333221 Mar 4 '12 at 2:53
This is very nice, but... how many users carefully review all their comments later on? – Neil Fein Mar 4 '12 at 3:36
@NeilFein: The ones that care enough to do so. Putting in another system is not going to make them care more. – Robert Harvey Mar 4 '12 at 3:37
Badges as proposed here? No, that's not gonna do much. Most users (I'd venture) barely know badges exist, or really care about them. A notification "[foo] post has been edited" in your SE dropdown menu? That I would support. – Neil Fein Mar 4 '12 at 3:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .