Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Locking a post has very severe consequences for a post, you cannot

  • Upvote or downvote on it
  • Edit it
  • Vote to close or reopen it
  • Comment on it
  • Add new answers to it

Because of these severe consequences I usually avoid locking altogether and try to deal with the problem in other ways. Locking just has far too severe side-effects for my taste, I don't want to prevent anyone from voting or answering just because there is an edit-war on the post.

We now also have some locking reasons, ignoring the historical significance reason as it isn't relevant here, they are the following:

Content dispute

This post has been locked while disputes about its content are being resolved. For more info visit meta.

Off-topic comments

This post has been locked due to the high amount of off-topic comments generated. For extended discussions, please use chat.

Both are common reasons for locking a post, and in both cases the locking is there to prevent only a small subset of what locking actually stops.

Those locking reasons shouldn't only be a text attached to the lock, but they should also change the behaviour of the locks:

  • A lock for off-topic comments should only prevent new comments
  • A lock due to an edit war should only prevent edits to the post

This would make using those locks less disruptive, and more useful to moderators.

share|improve this question
5  
Good suggestion! +1 – Alenanno Mar 6 '12 at 12:47
    
In the case of content dispute, I imagine users would start commenting, when they notice they cannot edit the post. In the case of off-topic comments, it's rare users start editing the post to add what they would add as comment. In the first case, I think that the lock on both comments and the post makes sense. – kiamlaluno Mar 6 '12 at 15:03
    
@kiamlaluno But you would e.g. want to still vote for those posts, which you can't while they are locked. – Mad Scientist Mar 6 '12 at 18:12
5  
If there is an edit war, I would rather prefer users cannot vote on that post too, to avoid a down-vote revenge. – kiamlaluno Mar 6 '12 at 18:30
3  

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .