Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
What are “Community Wiki” posts?
Revision history & community wiki links show the same page

Looking at a couple answers I've seen lately, I noticed something peculiar: Community Wiki posts* with only one author have not one, but two different links to the revisions page.

answered-at-{time} and {author-name} links

Is this entirely necessary? When clicking on the author's name in this case, I entirely would expect to be brought to the author's profile, rather than to the (potentially one-item-long) revisions list.

*(maybe only answers? couldn't find any good single-author CW question references)

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Time Traveling Bobby, kiamlaluno, random Mar 8 '12 at 17:32

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

I get tripped up by this all the time, though not just for single-user posts. – Matthew Read Mar 8 '12 at 6:21
They're community wiki. The point of that is that they can be edited by the community. They're not owned by a single person, and the focus is not on authorship. Thus, it doesn't make sense for them to link to the person's profile like other non-wiki posts. – Cody Gray Mar 8 '12 at 7:11
That's because the posts theoretically do not belong anymore to that user. – Time Traveling Bobby Mar 8 '12 at 7:53
But still, when you see a user's name linked, you naturally expect the link to go to that user's profile. I don't think anything will ever change that natural assumption in my mind. – animuson Mar 8 '12 at 8:39
@Bobby: I disagree - I understand the function of CW is meant to transfer ownership to the community, but I'm arguing that until it's actually edited by multiple people (and thus giving the "X revs, X users, XX% {user}" link instead), it's very mentally counter-intuitive for a link on that person's name not to point to their profile. – Nightfirecat Mar 8 '12 at 17:16