Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I would love to see which people have the most network-wide reputation, how can I see that?

share|improve this question
I'd venture that John Skeet wins - 474,000 . nice idea ! This should be a straight-forward feature to do. – Adel Mar 17 '12 at 17:37
Having both an all-time one, which obviously Jon would win, and the usual weekly, monthly and quarterly ones would be interesting. – Rory Alsop Jul 13 '12 at 15:31
No it would not be that interesting; the SO question rate makes it much easier to gain rep there, so the network-wide league woud be dominated by the SO crowd, hands-down. – Martijn Pieters Feb 16 '13 at 18:04
@MartijnPieters: Any statistics to back this statement up? As question rate goes up, answer rate goes up as well so it might not be as easy to get a few upvoted answers as you think. Hands-up, SO is well-known for its FGITW problem... ;) – Tom Wijsman Feb 16 '13 at 18:10
If you compare Stack Overflow leagues with Mathematics (second most active site in the network), you'll see, week-after-week that the weekly scores are almost always higher on SO. – Martijn Pieters Feb 16 '13 at 18:16
@mar statistics are still valid. 2 years later. – Patrick Hofman Jul 27 '15 at 19:05

Although a feature like this sounds very cool and could be implemented without much effort (I think), I do wonder what will be the usefulness of it.

Reputation among sites isn't exchangeable. The ratio on answers and up-votes differ a lot among sites. Also on some sites people are more willing to vote than others.

We do not want people to 'bet' on that other site because it has a higher ratio than the lower traffic, less popular site, which could use some hands.

Some figures, going on Martijn Pieters' comment:

Take the current years reputation (so from Jan 2015 until Aug 2015) of the highest scoring users on Stack Overflow and Mathematics (second most active site in the network): SO 70K, Mathematics 46K. And the top user in Seasoned Advice has an astonishing 7K! There is no way for a user in Seasoned Advice or even in Mathematics to come close to the SO user. No matter how much they try.

I think that the side effects of this feature must be thought of first. Then we should see the nice feature.

share|improve this answer
You might consider updating the numbers... the highest rep user on Seasoned advice has over 50 K now. Regardless, it sounded like the question is asking for total rep on all sites. I may only have 5 K on any one site but between all of my sites, that's 16K or so... which is still pitifully small but shrug. – Catija Jul 27 '15 at 22:25
@Catija the numbers are updated. It is the rep of the current year, not the grand total since every site has another start date. Seems unfair to compare. – Patrick Hofman Jul 28 '15 at 5:20
TeX has someone with 55k this year, by the by. – Nathan Tuggy Jul 28 '15 at 6:17
that is getting closer to SO already. Still not close to Seasoned Advice... @nat – Patrick Hofman Jul 28 '15 at 6:24
@PatrickHofman Ah, sorry I missed that, not enough coffee I guess – rene Jul 28 '15 at 7:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .