Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This is the problem at hand:

Is this a valid float comparison that accounts for a set number of decimal places?

--Explanation why the answer is wrong skipped--

So I asked myself what can I do if people are unlikely to see that the answer is wrong (My answer at the bottom, my warning buried in the comments) ?

Reading the fine FAQ... What if I see bad things happening ?

Ok, that seems to be a "bad thing"...
Fill out form...

declined - flags should not be used to indicate technical inaccuracies, or an altogether wrong answer

--Skipped section questioning if wrong answers should be flagged---

If the question/answer should not be flagged at all, then I seriously advise to edit the FAQ. While people are prone to disregard the documentation, I did read it and found no clue whatsoever that I should not flag it. Neither you or me want to waste your time for false alarms.

To be clear: Should wrong answers (or technical inaccuracies or whatever) never be flagged? Yes or no?
If yes, we can end the post right here.

In the comment under the accepted answer it is said that while the FAQ is open to interpretation, the flag interface is not so much open.

I look now at the flag interface.

There is a point: "It needs moderator attention"->"other".

I do not see that it quite clearly states that flagging wrong answers is "not so much open for interpretation".

Is it a good idea that instead

  • stating clearly in the FAQ what questions should be flagged

  • a moderator gets a false flag, needs to read and understand the question and the answer, denies the flag, the irritated flagger opens a question here, gets flak from the other members, starts a discussion etc. etc.?


share|improve this question
The FAQ isn't there to describe each flag in detail. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Mar 18 '12 at 16:33
I see a different problem. It's unclear what the OP wants, so it may or may not be achievable. Anyway, "serious problems" doesn't include "answers I consider wrong" in my interpretation. – Daniel Fischer Mar 18 '12 at 16:36
Well, now we have a precise question...If you can answer it with yes, please provide an explanation/links/comments. – Thorsten S. Mar 18 '12 at 17:00
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The correct answer is: Provide a better answer.

Flagging is used to highlight spam, rants, or otherwise content that doesn't belong on the site. The diamond moderators who action flags, are not subject matter experts, and therefore cannot determine the factual accuracy of a posts.

For that, we have votes. In the question you posted, the OP accepted the answer, and therefore, for his case scenario the code and the answer worked for him. He does not post the full details of how deep he wants to go, just to solve his particular problem, and it was solved. In fact, both answerers highlighted the fact that the solution only works in case by case basis and is affected by precision, and therefore the OP has been warned of possible problems with both solutions.

In fact, your answer counts as something to be flagged, as not an answer, since it reads like a rant. This is not a discussion forum, it's a Q&A. If you are 100% convinced it's the wrong answer, post the correct answer. Simple.

share|improve this answer
After clearing that up: What about adding that to the Stack Overflow FAQ ? It is even a one-liner, so why not changing it instead of the "If bad things are happening" ? – Thorsten S. Mar 18 '12 at 17:16
@ThorstenS. The flag interface itself quite clearly gives you a decent example of "bad things" to fall in line with the FAQ. The FAQ is open to interpretation. The FAQ flag interface, not so much. If between the two someone, and it does happen, come to the wrong conclusion, the declined flag reason will ensure it doesn't happen again. – BinaryMisfit Mar 18 '12 at 17:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .