Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Do we really need three different tags for different models of the same device? iPad 3 - no memory warning?

Yes, they're just bits and they don't take up much room, but isn't this what tag synonyms were made for?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, Emrakul, gnat, Martijn Pieters, Doorknob Jan 19 '15 at 15:24

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, Emrakul, gnat, Martijn Pieters, Doorknob
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

While I agree with you on that, their naming should at least be consistent. – Bertrand Marron Mar 20 '12 at 8:08
Here's what I'd call a real problem with version tags: Tags: iOS vs. iOS5 vs. iOS4, etc – BoltClock's a Unicorn Mar 20 '12 at 9:23
@Bertrand Marron: Completed. Not sure why it wasn't brought up earlier :) – BoltClock's a Unicorn Mar 20 '12 at 9:56
I'd rather stop the "error codes as tags" crazyness personally:… – Flexo Mar 20 '12 at 17:43
up vote 10 down vote accepted

There is such a great difference in hardware between iterations of these devices (the third-generation iPad has a Retina display, dammit) that it would only be sane to have tags for questions that pertain only to each of these models, given potential compatibility issues with apps and such. We do have version tags for all kinds of software anyway, so I don't see any harm in having "version" tags for the hardware/devices that we build software on.

Consistency? Hell yes. I've renamed to (in the same fashion as renaming to ).

I have no comments about ; I think we can just leave it at that since the third-generation iPad doesn't have a distinguishing name from the first-generation one, and "iPad 3" has been a popular nickname for it.

share|improve this answer
It's iPad3 internally, following iPad2. ipad-3 is a reasonable name, unlike certain other proposal. – Gilles Mar 20 '12 at 13:52
Well, yeah, third-generation iPad, iPad 3, makes sense ;) – BoltClock's a Unicorn Mar 20 '12 at 14:01
Sounds fine. Thanks for the consistency. – Greg Hewgill Mar 20 '12 at 18:06
"The new iPad" is the marketing term, just like Windows 6.2 is called "Windows 8". – Bo Persson Mar 20 '12 at 19:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .