Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Is there a policy on banning users (spammers) on Stack Exchange? And if so, where can I find it?

Case in point, there is a user that seems to have appeared at least twice on, who may simply be a bot spamming the questions and answers.

share|improve this question
Generally, users will just flag the offending posts as "spam" and the moderators will take care of any escalation that is required. – Cody Gray Mar 20 '12 at 18:46
@CodyGray Agreed, but if there is a bot doing this it's possible to overwhelm the moderators. – Karlson Mar 20 '12 at 18:55
Not really, our bots are better than their bots. If you see more than one or two posts from the same user that qualify as spam, flag one of their posts, choose the "other" field, and explain the pattern of problematic behavior that you see. They can take care of banning users based on IP addresses. Regular users don't do that. I'd post this as an answer, but I'm not sure if you're asking what to do as a regular user, or what the moderators can do. – Cody Gray Mar 20 '12 at 18:56
@CodyGray Actually question is for both. I mean I can flag to my hearts content but at some point a more drastic action may need to be taken and if so whose decision and how it is decided and what's the regular user's role in all this? Hence the policy... – Karlson Mar 20 '12 at 19:04
up vote 5 down vote accepted

There are a few things in place to protect against spam.

For one, every account is limited to 50 questions in 30 days, so if this is a legitimate user posting a lot of questions, they will get rate-limited fairly quickly.

If it's a bot, that's less likely to be an issue since the offenders can just automatically create more accounts. In this case, flag one of the posts for moderator attention and mention that the account looks suspicious and is a possible bot/spammer. Moderators can investigate from there and escalate to the Stack Exchange team if necessary.

Don't worry about overwhelming moderators. Prolific spam bots are actually relatively rare (so far), but even if we do run across one, it's easy to investigate their posts at that time and take appropriate action.

I mean I can flag to my hearts content but at some point a more drastic action may need to be taken and if so whose decision and how it is decided and what's the regular user's role in all this?

There is also a way for regular users to remove spam and offensive posts by flagging them as spam or offensive without getting moderators involved. Six spam/offensive flags on any post will delete it.

Beyond that, the regular user's role is to notify moderators. :) That's what makes Stack Exchange able to handle spammers and various other bad things with a fair amount of efficiency. Moderators can't be everywhere, but regular users can report strange or abusive behaviour.

Usually what happens is that moderators will take action against an offending account (by either destroying it or placing it in suspension, depending on the case) and that's the end of the matter. Persistent cases can be escalated to the Stack Exchange employees and we investigate further to determine if an IP ban is needed/feasible, or whether we can do anything else.

So, in short, these cases are investigated individually. Regular users and moderators are the first line of defense, followed by Stack Exchange employees who can set up an IP ban if necessary.

share|improve this answer
Can you clarify about answers? And as you said relatively rare (so far). – Karlson Mar 20 '12 at 19:07
@Karlson I don't know, maybe some day we'll get a crazy rash of spammers. :) What kind of clarification are you looking for? There's no rate-limit on answers, but the handling approach is the same - flag for moderator attention. I updated my answer to go into a bit more detail. – Adam Lear Mar 20 '12 at 19:10
That's the clarification. :) – Karlson Mar 20 '12 at 19:22
Note that the 50 questions per 30 days limit is tied to both user and IP - so creating a bunch of accounts won't stop it from kicking in. There are other, more severe rate limits that kick in sooner as well. – Shog9 Mar 21 '12 at 4:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .