What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 129 Stack Exchange communities.

The question Why is Git better than Subversion? was one of the first thousand posts on Stack Overflow.

It is obviously not constructive by current standards and has 37 answers. However, unlike most questions that get lots of answers, a large number of these are many-paragraph explanations, not just few-sentence remarks. The question had 53k views and a score of 395.

It's currently deleted. Does it deserve to be undeleted and historically locked?

share|improve this question
7  
Of course it does, for the reasons you listed. It's hard to think of a better lock candidate than this. –  Adam Rackis Mar 21 '12 at 20:33
3  
Stunningly, it appears that all of the answers on page 1 are useful in some way. You have to make it all the way to page 2 to find an answer that you could reasonably describe as bad. I think this one is worth preserving for that reason alone. –  Cody Gray Mar 21 '12 at 21:05
2  
More generally, though I find the titular question problematic (cf Gorilla vs Shark), I don't think that even today there would be anything wrong with a question regarding the advantages and disadvantages of Git as compared to Subversion. Not only is that a very interesting question, likely to be useful to many developers, but it encourages good, substantive answers and really isn't all that subjective. –  Cody Gray Mar 21 '12 at 21:06
    
One interesting fact is that it took well over a year for the top answer to be completed. Doesn't that indicate that new off-topic questions should also stay open at least a year, to see what happens? Or was life that different in the 00's? –  Bo Persson Mar 21 '12 at 21:35
    
LOCKED -- the system works. –  Adam Rackis Mar 22 '12 at 14:30

2 Answers 2

POLL Vote up to support undeletion and locking, vote down to oppose.

share|improve this answer

Git and svn are both moving targets. So a locked question is obsolete from birth and only gets more obsolete as time goes by.

share|improve this answer
    
Eh... The question was deleted once already. It won't survive on its own without the lock. –  Robert Harvey Mar 29 '12 at 4:44
    
I'm opposed to the original undeletion on the grounds of progressive uselessness over time. I know I won't win the argument. –  Rosinante Mar 29 '12 at 11:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .