Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Should What is the best Python book for experienced programmers? get a historical lock put on it?

It is the #1 result when searching on google when searching for "best python book"

share|improve this question
Ha - two people downvoted your question, but neither of your poll options. Have you been trolling on Stack Overflow or something? – Adam Rackis Mar 22 '12 at 16:27
I can tell Panama posting "Should X be locked?" and then him and Rackis mocking the downvotes is going to become a daily tradition. We don't need to vote on every post you stumble across -- mod flag it if you think it should be locked, and if it gets rejected and you feel badly that it needs a lock, then go to town on meta to try and talk them into it – Michael Mrozek Mar 22 '12 at 16:32
@MichaelMrozek I was told "Bring stuff like this up on Meta and let the community vote on it." in response to flagging one for locking (hence my posts yesterday). – Jeremy Banks Mar 22 '12 at 16:37
Setting these up as polls with answers representing yes/no responses is not going to work. Folks can already vote to close / re-open, and they can already vote on the proposal (question) itself - save answers for reasoned arguments for or against the proposal. – Shog9 Mar 22 '12 at 16:38
@AdamRackis Fine, then I meant "discuss"; I didn't intend to use "argue" in a negative way, sorry. There are tons of these old posts that I try hard to ignore, and I don't look forward to meta becoming a giant list of "should we delete X" for all old high-voted questions X. If SO mods want to do that then fine, I didn't know that was their policy till now – Michael Mrozek Mar 22 '12 at 16:49
@Robert - Shog did seem to imply that this was the proper way to resolve these issues - am I missing something? – Adam Rackis Mar 22 '12 at 16:58
Somebody should ask the question "Should we post meta questions about historical locks?". It's just meta enough to be awesome – Michael Mrozek Mar 22 '12 at 16:59
@JeremyBanks: I just think people should be making better use of their flags. I saw your declined flag on the "Storing Images in DB - Yea or Nay" question, but you did the right thing; you flagged first. That question is not exactly controversial, and meta should be used only as a last resort, when flagging produces an unsatisfying result. Shog's post addresses an SO question that was repeatedly opened, closed, deleted, undeleted, etc. – Robert Harvey Mar 22 '12 at 17:01
@AdamRackis: Part of the reason that moderators are declining these flags is they don't want the hassle anymore; they don't want to get blamed for deleting content or framing garbage, preferring that the community decide for themselves. A moderator should only have to step in and pass judgement on a post when it is clear that community consensus is not going to happen. – Robert Harvey Mar 22 '12 at 17:13
@Robert - sure (and I don't think I flagged anything on images in DB). Saving moderators from drama is exactly the reason I thought we should use meta questions like this. – Adam Rackis Mar 22 '12 at 17:19
@AdamRackis: Ah, you're right. That was Jeremy's flag. Responding to questions on meta is time-intensive for the mods. We have open/close and delete/undelete systems that should be used to their fullest potential first, and then flags, and then Meta if all that fails. – Robert Harvey Mar 22 '12 at 17:22
@Robert: Your comments here seem contradictory to me: «I just think people should be making better use of their flags...but you did the right thing; you flagged first.» «Part of the reason that moderators are declining these flags is they don't want the hassle anymore..., preferring that the community decide for themselves.» How do "flagging first" and "the community decide" go together? If we want decisions to be made by consensus, why wouldn't we make a Meta question? Isn't it best to allow more than 5 people to weigh in, voting here rather than directly for re-open/deletion? – Josh Caswell Mar 22 '12 at 18:53
@RobertHarvey: How is a consensus (or lack thereof) determined? Are you saying that people have to constantly patrol question to see if they get deleted and then vote to undelete them? I thought the purpose of the lock was so that if people want it to be deleted, it has to be brought up on Meta first. – Nicol Bolas Mar 22 '12 at 19:36
@RobertHarvey Interestingly, the balance was a little different before the poll options were deleted, IIRC. I don't like using votes on the question to determine action like this, because that could mean a poorly-asked question condemns another post to deletion forever. – Jeremy Banks Mar 22 '12 at 19:46
@RobertHarvey: "Look at this question. The consensus seems to be that a historical lock is inappropriate at this time." Consensus? It's been three hours. A healthy percentage of MSO users have been asleep this entire time. Exactly fifteen users have voted on this question. How can you call 15 users in 3 hours a consensus? The worst part is that if exactly 3 more users disagree, the question will disappear from the front page, making more upvotes less likely and thereby squelching debate. – Nicol Bolas Mar 22 '12 at 19:52

I'm guessing the main problem with this question is that book lists become outdated as soon as the ink is dry, and locked questions can't be updated—indeed, that's the whole point of locking them.

So essentially we'd be keeping around outdated information, without the ability to keep it more current.

It might be best to rip the band-aid off this one.

share|improve this answer
With this logic, the book itself becomes outdated and obsolete as soon as the ink is dry, therefore all books are worthless. (Come to think of it, every natural science professor I've ever had has made precisely this argument...) – Cody Gray Mar 23 '12 at 2:11
@Cody: I read this answer as an argument for re-opening the question, thereby forestalling deletion, and thus allowing the question to remain both available and able to be updated. You could also view it as an argument for deletion I suppose - but either way, it's a strong argument against locking. – Shog9 Mar 23 '12 at 2:23
@Cody - nobody loves books more than me, and one of my favorite books was written over 30 years ago (and is hardly obsolete). My point was that the list itself will be obsolete before the ink is dry. As the next version of Python and its various frameworks are developed, new books will be written to cover the new material. If the question is locked, then we'll be keeping around outdated info that can't be updated. – Adam Rackis Mar 23 '12 at 3:49
So yeah, as @Shog says, opening the question and letting the Python guys keep the thread up to date would be one option, but I didn't think that was acceptable to the community. I figured ripping the band-aid off and deleting it would be better than locking it, since the latter would guarantee that we're keeping bad info around. Shog: are questions like this officially off-topic? I'd love to see the question opened and kept fresh; I just didn't think that was an option. – Adam Rackis Mar 23 '12 at 3:51

Beyond the fact that this question potentially provides some useful information in its answers (however problematized that conclusion may be by the concern presented in Adam's answer), I think this question is worth a historical lock just by virtue of its "highly linked" status.

It's obviously a question that many users have found useful, not only useful enough to upvote, but also useful enough to link to elsewhere on the Internet. And extensively so.

One of the arguments made in favor of creating a historical locking system was to help prevent link rot across the web and keep Stack Exchange from "breaking the Internetz". Deleting this one outright looks like it would probably have that effect.

share|improve this answer
+1 because I hate deleting heavily linked-to posts. I just hate that a lock would prevent the next must-read python book from being added to the thread. – Adam Rackis Mar 23 '12 at 3:54
IMO this is a clear case where the information should be moved into the tag wiki. No reason the "top books" can't be maintained there, and it is editable. – Jeff Atwood Mar 24 '12 at 0:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .