Public betas typically last from 60 to 90 days, although they can go on longer.

I think it's fair to say that 60 to 90 days is not anywhere near representative. Can we have that changed into a value that reflects the average of the actual beta periods?

Sidenote: my favorite site has been in beta for a thousand days.

share|improve this question
    
Yeaaaaah, 6+ months would seem to be a generously low figure, if not 12+ –  Ben Brocka Mar 22 '12 at 19:46
3  
The new /about page (currently being deployed, it hasn't hit all beta sites yet) doesn't mention the beta status any more. There is a section on beta in /faq but it doesn't have any such time interval. So I guess this request is now moot. –  Gilles Jan 16 '13 at 1:17
add comment

closed as off-topic by AsheeshR, Jonathan Hobbs, Lance Roberts, Josh Crozier, Martijn Pieters Jan 18 at 8:47

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The problem described here can no longer be reproduced. Changes to the system or to the circumstances affecting the asker have rendered it obsolete. If you encounter a similar problem, please post a new question." – AsheeshR, Jonathan Hobbs, Lance Roberts, Josh Crozier, Martijn Pieters
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Browse other questions tagged .