Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Since Joomla 1.6 and 1.7 were bridges to 2.5 which is the long term release, I was wondering if there was a reason to keep all three. Especially since any extension for 1.6 should work with 1.7 and 2.5 and no one should be on 1.6 or 1.7 anymore.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Jack Douglas, Monica Cellio, CRABOLO, Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard Aug 15 '14 at 21:07

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Jack Douglas, Monica Cellio, CRABOLO, Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Generally, version-specific tags are discouraged. Most people end up using them when they don't apply, i.e., on general questions where the specific version in use is irrelevant.

Really, probably 90% of questions should just have a tag, no version necessary.

That said, these types of retags are not something that can really be carried out automatically through the creation of a synonym. People who did use the version-specific tags correctly should not be forced into using a generic tag just because others don't understand how the tag system works. Someone who is knowledgeable about the framework should really go through the questions and retag them manually.

Once that's done, then we can look into creating synonyms, but it's probably unnecessary. Joomla 1.6, 1.7, and 2.5 are different versions, and I imagine that the differences are probably at least somewhat relevant, else they wouldn't have incremented the version numbers. Whether those different versions actually convey any useful information with regards to particular questions is a different issue, but one that has to be handled by a knowledgeable human, rather than a computer or script.

share|improve this answer
Joomla 1.5 is very different from the 1.6/1.7/2.5 trio, so the version number distinguishing 1.5 from the latter is important. There are no major differences in the latter trio - 1.6 and 1.7 were temporary until 2.5 came out. 1.6 and 1.7 are now EOL and users should be on 2.5 so 1.6/1.7 isn't useful anymore. (Technically 1.5 is as well but it's a very involved process to upgrade so there will be many sites using 1.5 for a while). I haven't seen any attributable 1.6 vs 1.7 vs 2.5 issues crop up since for the most part the core is the same with extra security patches. – Gisto Mar 28 '12 at 16:33
The fact that they're end-of-lifed doesn't mean that there aren't old questions about specific versions. Tag synonyms apply retroactively as well, they don't just apply to new questions. – Cody Gray Mar 28 '12 at 16:34

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .