What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

Personally I up vote questions I think are useful but not necessarily important to me (I only up vote answers I understand and agree with) and I ALWAYS up vote a question I answer.

But it obvious that people are very miserly with their question up-votes. I think this is because of the reputation rewarded for an up-vote.

I propose a reduction in reputation for question up-votes to 3.

This will encourage people to vote more and thus the amount of reputation earned would be similar.

share|improve this question
    
Share the rep, share the rep –  deleted Jun 29 '09 at 22:55
    
I wish others did that I have a bunch of questions with at least 2 answers that have miserly up votes. One has 4 answers and a score of zero. –  JPM Mar 21 '12 at 15:21
    
I am pretty free with my upvotes as well, but I guess it is also a function of how one spends their time on SO as well. Those who review more generate more views and hopefully produce more votes. There are so many questions on here now after several years that haven't seen the light of day in ages. –  demongolem Oct 17 '12 at 19:05

4 Answers 4

up vote 21 down vote accepted

I think people are pretty free with the up votes. My own analyis has show an up to down vote ratio starting at 10 last fall and growing to about 12 now.

Like Brent Ozar, I also investigated the relationship between votes and other user data (like reputation and up:down vote ratios, etc.) in a couple of blog posts, like these:

Here are some of my favorite graphs:

Down (x-axis) vs. Up (y-axis) vs. Reputation (bubble size)

Stack Overflow: Down Votes versus Up Votes versus User Reputation

Up Votes as a percentage by User Join Date and Average User Reputation by Join Date

Up Votes as a percentage by User Join Date and Average User Reputation by Join Date

Larger images and other stats on the blog.

share|improve this answer
7  
the Rich B data point is hilarious. His friends call him.. MISTER DOWNVOTE! (and then he downvotes them) –  Jeff Atwood Jun 28 '09 at 13:51
    
+1 for the neato graphs. :-) –  Jason S Jun 28 '09 at 15:43
2  
I have friends? –  GEOCHET Jun 29 '09 at 20:30
    
I nearly spit out my drink when I saw that graph –  TheTXI Jun 29 '09 at 20:32
2  
Considering the scaling of the Y axis versus the X axis, we have some people with some serious 'splaining to do in regards to upvotes. Having a lot of downvotes is not a bad thing, but to just blatantly upvote everything you see? That is a massive detriment to the reputation system. –  GEOCHET Jun 29 '09 at 20:43
2  
Maybe they don't like to downvote. Maybe they prefer leaving comments to the user on how they can improve the question/answer. Let them use the site the way they see fit. –  toast Jul 6 '09 at 23:51
    
I thought Jon Skeet's circle would take up half the graph. –  Troggy Jul 22 '09 at 18:14
    
@Troggy: if the graph were done today, it most likely would :) –  perbert Nov 15 '09 at 21:41

Generally speaking, the number of upvotes an answer can expect is a function of its potential audience. Fun/CW questions have the widest audiences and receive the most votes. The most popular tags (like C#) are next. Most questions and probably most upvotes per answer of the "real" questions. And it trails away after that. JPA questions, for example, aren't often easy but will rarely garner more than 1-2 votes.

share|improve this answer

I've pondered this, but then you end up with questions about how people use scale. For instance I have an acquaintance who has said that on a scale of 1 to 10 he never ever rates anything 10 because there is always room for improvement. So even on a small scale is anything less than 3 reflect poor quality? Would people start up voting with 1s poor-mediocre answers?

The current system is clear an unambiguous. -1 if it was poor. +1 if it was good. 0 if it was unremarkable. Simple is better.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 I agree with the "simple is better" comment. And tell your acquaintance "Nine is the new ten". –  Dennis Williamson Jun 28 '09 at 13:59
    
I just started asking him to rate things on a scale of 1 to 11 :) –  Oorang Jun 28 '09 at 14:01

This was one of the questions I explored at SPWho2.com:

What kinds of questioners do the most upvoting?

Or in other words, what tags are the friendliest? Are people who ask questions with a particular tag more likely to do upvotes? These are NOT the upvotes performed on their question - these are the upvotes done by the questioner themselves.

As it turns out, yes, there's a huge variation. Some examples:

  • People who asked "beginner" tag questions average 393 upvotes.
  • People who asked "homework" tag questions average just 33 upvotes.

You can see the full report on SPWho2.com, along with a report on average questioner downvotes. I find it hilarious that people who ask vim and emacs questions are much more likely to perform downvotes than other users - a little grumpy, eh?

Next month I'll add one for average answerer upvotes too. For example, are people who answer "PHP" questions more likely to upvote others? What are the friendliest tags, and what are the least friendly?

share|improve this answer
    
OMG -- t-shirts ?!?!?! –  Jason S Jun 28 '09 at 15:44
    
Heh - yeah. I was dying to build something to wear to the StackOverflow DevDays events. –  Brent Ozar Jun 29 '09 at 12:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .