What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

I am aware that is was asked to have full list of moderator and completed, however I couldn't find anywhere any indication of past moderators e.g. someone who was moderator year or two ago but no longer act as one.

My incentive for asking for such a thing: this answer (10K+ rep needed to see it) was deleted by a single member who is not a moderator now. I can only guess he was moderator back in March 30th 2011 when he deleted it, but it's only an assumption.

So, to the existing moderators list I suggest to add another link like "Archive" or "Past moderators".

share|improve this question
6  
Alternatively, some indication on their profile would be nice. I know a few times this has come up with SU, where we had a big moderator turnover. –  Diago Apr 5 '12 at 10:58
2  
@Diago not sure about it... when someone stops being a moderator it might be because he asked so and doesn't want people to know he was a moderator just from viewing his profile. –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 11:00
1  
Fair comment. But we don't normally ask because we don't want to be, we normally ask because other things make it hard for us to commit to the duties of being a moderator. –  Diago Apr 5 '12 at 11:03
    
@Diago OK, fair suggestion but think it will be harder to implement than a simple list updated daily or weekly. :) –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 11:05
3  
Will a list of future moderators suffice? –  Lix Apr 5 '12 at 11:16
1  
@Lix if you can integrate this into the system, sure! ;) –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 11:21
1  
So now you want to torment us even after we ragequit? ;P –  Yannis Apr 5 '12 at 11:23
    
@Yah aka Yan you got me! :-D –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 11:24
    
who would be able to see such a list? Anyone or close-voters or 10Kers or diamonds or...? I would also consider an alternative way of exposing this information - for example in user profile page (again, maybe with limited visibility) –  gnat Apr 5 '12 at 14:00
    
@gnat I was thinking anyone same way like the active moderators list. As for through profile page it was suggested in the first comment here. :) –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 14:11
    
@ShaDowWizArd I see. Having same level visibility as active mods list feels slippery doesn't it? As for profile page indication I somehow (mis)read first comment as self-identification, like in About Me text. I was thinking about something automatically added by system instead. Something like drops of blood around gravatar, stuff like that –  gnat Apr 5 '12 at 14:27
    
@gnat that's how I interpreted the first comment as well but only Diago can answer this feel free to ping him and ask. Anyway might be a good point, guess it's not as simple as I was thinking. –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 14:29

2 Answers 2

It's possible that someone would not want it known that they used to be a moderator through any means. Creating a list like this would take it completely out of individuals' control. If we asked someone to step down, it could also be a bit awkward.

Those who do want to reveal this can already edit their profile. Do we need a feature for it?

share|improve this answer
    
So by simple request such person can be removed from the list.. still - how can I know for sure "Gumbo" was a moderator when deleting the post rather then exploiting some unknown security breach? –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 13:50
    
@ShaDowWizArd You could always ask. :) Now we're talking not just a list, but tracking who's excluded. Not to mention using an opt-out model. I don't think potentially inconveniencing a lot of former moderators (and employees who'd be maintaining the list) is worth it considering the fairly remote chance that someone finds a deletion exploit. –  Anna Lear Apr 5 '12 at 13:53
2  
And what about historical significance? E.g. if you'll want to tell your grandchildren in 30 years "You know, your grandmother was moderator of the famous Stack Overflow, here is the proof" :) –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 13:57
    
@ShaDowWizArd Here's all the proof my grandchildren will ever need. Also I had no idea Gumbo was a moderator, but going through his MSO questions it was pretty easy to find out that he was. –  Yannis Apr 5 '12 at 14:10
    
@Yah Wasn't aware of those cards.. nice! Running out of excuses here, lol - but still, one can always hope right? :) –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 14:13
    
There's also historical election data which could suffice as "proof" that somebody used to be a moderator. For example, from Stack Overflow's election page you can see that SLaks was elected but no longer has a diamond. –  nhinkle Apr 5 '12 at 15:48

These are not the droids you're looking for

These are^not the droids you're looking for^either :/.

There's no visible link, but adding /election to the URL of any site gets you the list of all elected mods. I'm not sure what happens on sites which have ongoing elections. Or where to find SO employees who've been fired (do any of those exist?).

EDIT: Alright, either that page only lists the past year's election (in which case Below is a historical record of all elections to date is wildly inaccurate), or, as @Diago said,

That list does not include moderators selected and gone before elections became and official process using the software itself. In the past it used to be a meta post with a list of potential candidates.

So nope, no droids. @Devs pretty please???

share|improve this answer
1  
That list does not include moderators selected and gone before elections became and official process using the software itself. In the past it used to be a meta post with a list of potential candidates. –  Diago Apr 5 '12 at 11:07
2  
Not really what I'm looking for.. it's only listing starting from 2011 - what about three years ago? –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 11:07
    
@ShaDowWizArd: Strange. I see a Below is a historical record of all elections to date right up there. Probably has to do with the thingy `@Diago mentioned –  Manishearth Apr 5 '12 at 11:10
    
More likely then began to keep record (of the elections) only at 2011. –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 11:12
    
@ShaDowWizArd: Noted, added into the post –  Manishearth Apr 5 '12 at 11:17
    
KK fair enough.. +1 for the effort. –  Shadow Wizard Apr 5 '12 at 11:19
    
@ManishEarth The actual election pages where only used from 2011 onwards, however, before that and before SE 2.0, elections where generally a much more informal process, and in some cases, didn't even happen in the case of SU and SF. Your original answer is valid for everything from 2011 onwards however. –  Diago Apr 5 '12 at 11:26
1  
The election pages do not include pro tempore moderators on beta sites, moderators on the Trilogy (Stack Overflow, Meta Stack Exchange, Server Fault, Super User) who were nominated through the more informal process used until 2011 that Diago mentioned, or moderators who were runner-ups in elections and were brought in after an elected candidate left or after the workload increased. –  Gilles Apr 5 '12 at 11:35
    
@Gilles Interestingly, the latter case of brought in afterwards does show on the SO election page, it may however be a new feature. –  Diago Apr 5 '12 at 11:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .