Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Periodically we see questions on SO where the question smells of evil intent: requests for keylogger code, hiding tasks from task manager, and today one for killing windows if the user's process is killed from the task manager.

When voting to close such a question, there's no good choice. Could we have one for "questioner wants to know how to harm others"?

share|improve this question
We also desperately need facepalm as a close reason. (note: not my idea, seen it somewhere) – Manishearth Apr 6 '12 at 15:03
Related: What flag to use for malicious code? – a cat Apr 6 '12 at 15:06
I think this has been discussed quite a few times, but the gist of it is: Not our problem. If the question is close worthy, vote to close for one of the typical reasons, if you don't like the motive of the asker, down vote and don't answer it. If seen people questioning the motives of the asker in comments, and there was rarely a satisfactory response, so I'd say don't even bother. – Yannis Apr 6 '12 at 15:07
@Manishearth A facepalm close notification could be autogenerated in cases like this... I had half a mind of closing it as too localized just to confuse everyone ;P – Yannis Apr 6 '12 at 15:13
Just curious, I would dearly like to see that question about killing windows. Call it morbid curiosity if you like. – A.Grandt Apr 6 '12 at 16:26
Never mind, I think I found it, and I agree with the OP, I see no other reason for that one but for malicious intent.… – A.Grandt Apr 6 '12 at 16:35
@A.Grandt - perhaps it's a "kiosk" system where any termination of the kiosk software should cause the machine to power-cycle to return it to a "known good" state? One example of a reason for this, off the top of my head. – Rob Apr 6 '12 at 16:56
@Rob: The problem is, you can't do this with a normal software application. This is something you need the operating system to be involved in, and it is therefore off-topic for Stack Overflow. Feel free to close it on that basis. Questions about group policy (for Windows) or other locking down of an operating system for security/corporate/kiosk use belong on Server Fault. – Cody Gray Apr 6 '12 at 16:59
@TheEstablishment, yes, you can. kiosk.exe can start watchdog.exe as soon as it starts and (1) delegate shutdown responsibility to watchdog.exe and (2) restart watchdog.exe if it's ever terminated. The robustness of such an approach is not germane to the meta question though. My main point was/is that the original stackoverflow question doesn't necessarily have to have "malicious intent" and is a perfectly valid programming question. It's certainly not "not a real question"! =) – Rob Apr 6 '12 at 17:50
@random Thanks for the link. Thought-provoking discussion. – CPerkins Apr 9 '12 at 14:48
@Rob Good point. – CPerkins Apr 9 '12 at 14:48
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Use "Too Localized" as the close reason. If the question truly has evil intent, it's unlikely that anyone else would need the information.

Note that it isn't always easy (or even feasible) to distinguish a black hat from a white hat.

share|improve this answer
That makes sense, as the question won't be helpful to anyone else but the asker and the very few like minded teenagers. – Yannis Apr 6 '12 at 15:10

When voting to close such a question, there's no good choice.

Take this as a hint: if none of the close reasons apply, don't close the question.

I have yet to see a question whose “only motive (…) is evil”. Link or it didn't happen.

Black hat is not the same as evil. I'll repeat what I wrote on IT Security Meta: as a white hat, I find black hat questions valuable, they teach me what I'm supposed to defend against. Not only are black hat pursuits not intrinsically evil, but the discussion of black hat topics helps white hats as well.

Incidentally, I notice that you are already falling on the slippery slope from “only motive (…) is evil”, passing on “question smells of evil intent” (so, it's up to the asker to apply air freshener liberally, in fear of smelling bad?), and well on your way to “I dislike this question”.

share|improve this answer
I'm not in agreement with your slippery slope argument. But thanks for your thoughts. – CPerkins Apr 9 '12 at 14:38

Software by itself is not evil! It depends on how people use it. So I think its difficult to close such questions which will be very much valid, technically. In fact buffer/stack overrun was one of the very common exploitation methods in the past. Because of that, they improved and removed exec permissions from certain regions. So hacking helped to improve the system :)

So I feel, anything related to programming, irrespective of its intent, should be discussed in So!

share|improve this answer

Actually, if user is requesting a keylogger, I'd close it as not constructive.

If user is requesting something that may help him with creating keylogger, I wouldn't do anything.

I'm afraid that this feature would make user tend to close more such question which "looks like" they could be used for evil.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .