Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Today I was reading this classic answer again:

RegEx match open tags except XHTML self-contained tags

Below it I see a message that I guess I missed before:

This post has been locked while disputes about its content are being resolved. For more info visit meta.

The link to meta just goes to the meta home page. That surprised me; given the preceding text, I was expecting it to show me a meta post about the disputes, or something about their resolution. Leading me to the meta home page did not really seem helpful.

I'm just wondering, since meta was explicitly referenced in that lock message, *is there* some record of the disputes here on meta? Given the (pretty hilarious) revision history, I can get a sense of it. I'm just hoping for something more in-depth than that.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, rene, Lance Roberts, ProgramFOX, mhlester Jun 20 '14 at 18:36

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, rene, Lance Roberts, ProgramFOX, mhlester
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I might be wrong, but I don't think that that messages necessarily indicates that there is an actual ongoing discussion on Meta. Rather that Meta would be the appropriate place for discussion about it. At least that's how I interpreted it when I noticed something similar for other questions. – Bart Apr 17 '12 at 21:50
No, there's no meta post. What "in depth" would you like to know? That answer has 19 moderator flags cast on it... 'Nuff said? The lock was a "stop the insanity" move. – Robert Harvey Apr 17 '12 at 21:54
@RobertHarvey, just wanted to see if there was further discussion, since I thought based on the revision history that there might be some (sorry if that's a frivolous reason). Also, I suppose I was a little misled by the lock message, but Bart's comment explains that. – Ben Lee Apr 17 '12 at 22:08
It appears the discussion is here, but I do agree with the OP. The answer by father monk @bobince has become the stuff of legend and should be treated with the respect and honour it deserves, oh holy one. – Chris Nash Apr 8 '13 at 8:56
Since there is no dispute about its content, it appears that the lock itself is incorrect. – Joshua Drake Dec 31 '13 at 15:57
@JoshuaDrake: There is a constant dispute about the content. People think the Unicode text is an error and try to correct it, the rest of the community disputes that it is in error. Most recent example. – Martijn Pieters Jun 20 '14 at 13:55

Browse other questions tagged .