What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Recently a user had completely lost it after getting question banned and he posted 3 spam answers:

10k only - No mods were on at the time to process our flags, but we mob-deleted them from the Lounge<C++> chatroom.

All three of these posts had links to... apparently gay porn.

We managed to delete and remove the links from the latter two. But the first one was deleted and locked by Community from spam/offensive flags. So we are unable to remove that link. (even if it's visible to 10k users only, we prefer to get rid of the link)

So can we get the Community user to automatically remove all links from a post that it deletes?

share|improve this question
    
I'm not sure I'd be happy about automatic deletion of all links, but I have to agree that it would be better than the current situation. –  sbi May 2 '12 at 7:58
    
We could also extend this to include images as well. –  Mysticial May 2 '12 at 7:59
    
@sbi I think this question is requesting that we automatically de-link all of the links in a post that is removed via spam flags. I don't see how that would be objectionable. –  Cody Gray May 2 '12 at 8:00
1  
I flagged the answer, moderator should be able to edit it even though it's locked. Anyway I can't see the reasoning in locking the answer. –  Shadow Wizard May 2 '12 at 8:00
    
@sbi: I agree, but keep in mind you can always go to the revision history if something useful was accidentally lost. (Additionally, I'm sure 99% of the posts Community deletes and locks are trash and never come back to life anyway.) –  GManNickG May 2 '12 at 8:06
1  
@GManNickG - it's useful when looking at new spam being able to quickly determine if it's the same thing as something that was previously deleted, so the links should remain visible, even if not clickable in my view. –  Flexo May 2 '12 at 8:57
    
@awoodland: Is it, though? (Honest question, not rhetoric.) Whenever I come across something deleted as spam I pretty much ignore it. How useful is it to evaluate spam? –  GManNickG May 2 '12 at 9:04
2  
IMO a better solution would be to not lock these posts anymore, so the community can edit out links after deletion on a case-by-case basis. Locking doesn't serve a purpose anyway; you used to be able to just undelete your mod-deleted posts unless locked, but that no longer works. –  lunboks May 2 '12 at 9:17
2  
@GManNickG - several times I've nearly missed that things are basically reposts of previously deleted spam because they've been edited to --------------------- or similar and that makes a difference in how I flag it and presumably how moderators handle it. (If it looks like a one-time thing I'd tend to give it the benefit of the doubt and flag as "not an answer" or edit instead of spam flag and I'm less likely to check for sockpuppets in that case too) –  Flexo May 2 '12 at 9:21
    
@awoodland: Ah, that makes quite a bit of sense. Thanks. –  GManNickG May 2 '12 at 9:40

4 Answers 4

up vote 14 down vote accepted

Going forward, deleted answers that have had any spam or offensive flags raised against them, will not show the answer body but the following text:

This answer was marked as spam or offensive and is therefore not shown - you can see the revision history for details

Where "the revision history" links to the answer revision history.

The vote box (with score) and comments will still appear.

With you in the next build (rev 2013.10.8.1061).

share|improve this answer
    
One presumes that if the answer is undeleted (perhaps because it was falsely flagged) this message will not appear? Or will a manual rollback be needed? –  Al E. Oct 8 '13 at 12:56
3  
@AlEverett - If the answer is undeleted, it will reappear in its full glory. –  Oded Oct 8 '13 at 13:04
2  
Excellent. Now I can brag about having a feature request implemented more than a year after I requested it. :D:D –  Mysticial Oct 8 '13 at 16:05
    
Will this be rolled out for questions, too? –  MPD Oct 10 '13 at 12:25
    
@MPD - It hasn't been implemented for questions, as those are a lot harder to come by once deleted. –  Oded Oct 10 '13 at 12:26
    
So in case of an offensive message that a mod is about to delete, the mod should first flag it as offensive before deleting it? Otherwise if it has no spam/offensive flags it will still show up. –  jippie Oct 12 '13 at 6:21
    
@jippie - Assuming that the moderator has not been alerted to the post by others flagging it as spam/offensive in the first place? If the post has no flags on it, yes. But it tends to be the other way around - people flag and moderators delete in response. –  Oded Oct 12 '13 at 7:59
    
Worth to mention the user details are hidden as well. :) –  Shadow Wizard Oct 24 '13 at 10:31
1  
The styling can do with some work, at least on Stack Overflow; the link for the revision history does not stand out in any discernible way. Perhaps an underline can be added back for links in deleted posts? –  Martijn Pieters Jul 1 at 14:17
    
Hey Oded, what happens if a post flagged as offensive is then self-deleted by the poster, who then realizes his or her mistake and tries to correct it? –  jmort253 Jul 18 at 22:24
1  
@jmort253 - the OP will be able to edit the post. And it can be undeleted. If it remains deleted, the message will display. –  Oded Jul 19 at 7:04

I found this feature-request because I wanted to post a similar one. I'm in favor of this proposal, but would like to go a step further:

Completely replace the content of a spam post with a general message.

While it is true that normal users can't see deleted post anyway, we moderators and 10k+ users can see them, and they can be quite annoying. Especially because they are colored differently they tend to catch your eyes. And I don't like to see gay porn links or viagra ads during my daily moderator duties. On my main site TeX.SE we often delete the content manually before the post gets closed as spam.

If someone wants to check the original content he/she can do so by checking the history. Also an incorrectly closed post can simply be rolled back.

share|improve this answer
    
It's not just seeing them that's annoying. Depending on your browser's prefetch settings, the evil website can get your IP and browser stats -- useful when tracking you across the web. Plus they know that you are a 10K+ user. Finally, when they see the traffic, they can rightly assume that their attack worked at least in part. ... Best to deny them any satisfaction. –  Awesome Poodles Aug 6 '12 at 1:47

I think lunboks' comment hit the nail right on the head:

There is no reason to lock an answer deleted for being spam.

I don't understand why this got locked, but had it gotten unlocked the moment it was deleted, everything would have been fine.

share|improve this answer
4  
It gets locked to avoid the post is edited, probably from the OP who wrote it. It also avoids the post is accidentally undeleted, in the case it is not so evident it is spam. –  kiamlaluno May 2 '12 at 11:20
1  
@kiamlaluno: Why would it be a problem if such a post would be edited by the OP? And defending against "accidental undeletion" by allowing a link to gay porn to be visible to thousands of SO users seems a but, um, odd. –  sbi May 2 '12 at 16:41
    
If the OP wrote spam, the same user could remove the links he used, hoping that somebody would undelete the post, and then add again the same links. It would be more odd if somebody doesn't notice it is spam, and undelete it, letting all the users see the post. I see many spam posts, on Drupal Answers, and frankly, once I know it spam, and it has been deleted, I stop worrying about it; I don't even read the post, once I see it is deleted, and locked by Community. –  kiamlaluno May 2 '12 at 16:53
    
@kiamlaluno: First — if the OP removes the spam links and if(!) the answer gets then deleted, the answer is in the same state as if the OP had not put in a spam link at all. He could corrupt an existing answer by adding spam links no matter whether that answer had any spam before or not. Second — it's neigh impossible to get a closed answer reopened after you have spammed the site. Finally — if the spam is seen in the then-changed-again answer, the answer will be delete-voted or flagged. –  sbi May 3 '12 at 9:36

I think deleted posts are supposed to be hidden away. Thus, it really doesn't matter what their content is--you're not supposed to look at them except for moderation issues.

As such, the links allow other mode to see that the post was rightfully deleted. Though this can be seen from the revision history, I guess. So I'm on the fence on this one. Deleted posts are for mod-eyes-only, so we shouldn't have to clean them up. Mods should know what to expect whn checking out the links on a deleted post.

How about you change this to: "link-ify all images in Community-deleted spam posts" (i.e., replace the image with a link). This could avoid some NsFW situations for our poor mods.

Update: Alright, I see what you guys mean. Yeah, we should have Community hxxp:// the links or something.

share|improve this answer
4  
They're not for mod-eyes-only. Deleted content is visible to all users with 10k or more reputation. Agreed that they are basically hidden away, but then again, they're not completely hidden. What would be the advantage of turning links in something that is conclusively spam into images when we could just remove them altogether? –  Cody Gray May 2 '12 at 8:05
    
When the answer is downvoted and greyed out, it's difficult to tell where the links are... let's just say that I accidentally clicked on one of them. That page basically disabled the back and close buttons on my browser. I had to kill FireFox from the Task Manager... –  Mysticial May 2 '12 at 8:06
    
@TheE oh, I consider 10k==mod but not 10k===mod. So I use them interchangeably. I wasn't saying we convert links into images, I was saying we convert images into links. –  Manishearth May 2 '12 at 8:07
    
Alright, I'll change it to say we should use "hxxp://" or something. I see what you guys mean –  Manishearth May 2 '12 at 8:08
    
@Manishearth: Regardless of whether or not people are supposed to do something, they can and inevitably will. (If you're asking people to not make mistakes for the system to work, you're creating an unmanageable system.) I think it is a problem to leave links/images hanging around spam-flagged posts. –  GManNickG May 2 '12 at 8:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .