Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I was looking for unanswered question and I came across this Display mySQL using JTable which is having an upvote to its name.

After reading the entire question I come to the comments part, to find that the user had made a silly mistake in the question, and he accepted that mistake within the comments without posting a formal answer. I did put an answer to the question so that someone as me does not stumble across the question.

I don't think reading an answer before an interesting question is a good practise (but that is my personal opinion)

There are a few questions on the site where similar problem is there. The questions get answered in the comments, rather a silly mistake is pointed out in the comment and the user accepts his mistake, and very few come back to the question which is lying without an answer.

This can be resolved if the user decide to close/mark answered to the question without an answer, and ask him to give comments. The comment could be then considered as a self-answer to the question.

P.S. I am not well versed with the tags. Please re-tag if necessary.


I hit on this example.
Windows Auth directory in IIS - web.config Permission problem (Answer by user = 3rd from last comment)

It is a legit question, which expands and crystallizes further in a series of comments, and finally gets answered in the comments. The user wants the question as answered but could not mark it down as there is no answer available to be marked answered. Once he leaves the question he never returns back to it, leaving the question unanswered.

The point is when the window of research closes, the question is left then and there. It is interesting to note that the user did return to mark his answer but could not find a way.

So! If there was a answer check mark next to the question(Suggesting to mark the question as answered), this answer would have been marked. As there were no answer to feed the design the user could have been requested to write a comment(In a new popup or somewhere). This comment would then serve as an answer.

share|improve this question
Closed != "answered". This isn't an issue tracking system. – dmckee May 3 '12 at 19:33
Found a similar question Mark a comment as answer to a question but a different suggestion. – Nitin Chhajer May 3 '12 at 19:39
@dmckee I was about to use Delete but did not want to be too rude and that feature already exist :) – Nitin Chhajer May 3 '12 at 19:41
If you feel that the other question treats your needs feel free to delete this one. The system will stop you from deleting questions with answers, but comments are second-class citizens by design. – dmckee May 3 '12 at 19:43
dmckee we know its not an issue tracking system but he raises a GREAT point. I've been on SO for quite some time and I notice this a LOT. – JonH May 3 '12 at 19:45
The example question at hand is too localized and should be closed and deleted. – animuson May 3 '12 at 19:47
I'm a bit confused. If the question is a real question, posting the answer as an answer is the right thing to do. If the question is nonsense due the poster misunderstanding something or presenting incorrect information, then it should be deleted. Why should there be a third state? Burying answers in comments is not a good practice, and why would the OP be more likely to select the comment as the answer rather than post an answer? (They've already ignored how the site works.) – Matthew Read May 3 '12 at 19:57
@JonH: No arguments about the point, just about the phrasing of the title. Nitin: I offer my apologies if I came across to brusquely. – dmckee May 3 '12 at 20:01
@dmckee No offence taken, thanks for being humble. :) – Nitin Chhajer May 3 '12 at 21:11
@MatthewRead A good question is followed by a good answer, whereas a not so good question(it still qualifies as a question) is followed by comments to make it good. In the process the answer is found which never reaches the answer section. It is then left to others to do the job of a moderator that too when they are in search for a good question to tease their minds. – Nitin Chhajer May 3 '12 at 21:15
For the second example, there's no reason you (or anyone who comes across the question in the future) couldn't put together an answer from the information in the comments. On the other hand, it's no big deal if the question stays just how it is forever. The really annoying situation is when an OP comments: "Never mind! I found the answer!" and doesn't let us in on what they found. – Jon Ericson May 3 '12 at 22:09

You did the right thing: you moved the answer in the comment into an actual answer. You even got an upvote for doing so.

Now the question will likely drop off the front page forever and only be noticed by the occasional Google search. No further action is necessary. (Although the original asker might be nice enough to accept your post as the correct "answer".)

(Note that questions without answers are sometimes bumped to the top of the question stack, so providing an answer as an answer that's upvoted keeps the question from rearing its head again.)

Just for kicks, I ate my own dogfood.

share|improve this answer
I agree and that was the reason for doing so. But my point is that this whole thing could probably be avoided if the user had the opportunity to set the question as answered. – Nitin Chhajer May 3 '12 at 21:20
@NitinChhajer The whole thing could probably be avoided if the user had posted the answer as an answer, or deleted the question. – Matthew Read May 3 '12 at 21:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .