Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The best answer can change over time (and should be re-assignable as such); and the asking person may be the best resource to eventually answer their own question (it is a problem dearer to them than to us).

That said, would it be considered an appropriate action to automatically flag for review a newly minted self-accepted answer in the event that the question was answered three or more months prior?

Flagging for review doesn't imply that the user did something wrong, it just implies that a moderator would need to inspect the situation to determine that the user either:

  • Found some new solution, detail, or evidence that improved upon the answer and as such should be captured through the existing self-answer mechanism.


  • Determined that accepting their own answer with excerpts from a previously existing answers could benefit them in some way. (I already know that it won't give the acceptance points).

While the latter scenario borders anti-social behavior, a human needs to weigh in on whether anything truly odd occurred; hence the idea of auto-flagging instead of taking some (yet undetermined) action.

share|improve this question
It depends... if it was 99.9% copied directly from another answer then it's a bit low. If it's a mash-up of a couple of answers with a bit of your own work thrown in that answers the question better than any of the previous answers did, or even could be considered canonical then why not? – ben is uǝq backwards May 3 '12 at 20:48
It's basically one sentence taken out of the previously accepted question (which rambled a bit as the poster kept editing and clarifying their question). This scenario is arguably low, but it could also be argued as "clarification". It requires a judgement call, hence a human with guidelines. Flagging seems to have semi-negative connotations, but is auto "request review" a good idea at all? – Edwin Buck May 3 '12 at 21:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .