What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

Stack Exchange 2.0 sites have "not a real question" as closing reason; the only exception is this very site.

screenshot taken from meta.drupal.stackexchange.com

May this closing reason be re-added?

I have never seen feature requests, or bug reports being closed as not a real question simply for the fact they are request, or reports; if they have been closed as such is because it was difficult to tell what was being asked. I think the community on Meta Stack Overflow already shown to know when this closing reason should be used; the fact that in the meta sites I visit the same closing reason has never been used for feature requests should mean users know when the closing reason should be used.

share|improve this question
    
Plenty of things here aren't questions, and are perfectly valid... –  Nick Craver May 7 '12 at 15:07
    
@NickCraver That would apply to other meta sites as well. I don't think bug reports, or feature requests would be closed as "not a real question" just for the fact they are bug reports, or feature requests; if that were to happen, they would be clearly closed for the wrong reason. –  kiamlaluno May 7 '12 at 15:19
3  
then the correct request would be to remove it from those child metas as well, would it not? The criteria seems pretty straight-forward to me, it shouldn't be offered as a close reason if it's not a reason to close the question. –  Nick Craver May 7 '12 at 15:21
    
@NickCraver If that closing reason is removed, what other closing reason should be used? Should "not constructive" be used? –  kiamlaluno May 7 '12 at 15:26
2  
Absolutely, if someone brings a rant here on meta with no real problem, no solution and is doing something completely not constructive, that's a valid close reason...it gets used for precisely that reason fairly regularly. –  Nick Craver May 7 '12 at 15:27
1  
@NickCraver I kind of miss noise or pointless, but it is a kinder .. gentler Meta after all. –  Tim Post May 8 '12 at 13:40
    
I want to close this as not a real question. What a Catch-22. –  BoltClock's a Unicorn May 8 '12 at 13:42
    
@BoltClock'saUnicorn You could also close it as off-topic; that doesn't mean it is off-topic. –  kiamlaluno May 8 '12 at 13:44
add comment

1 Answer 1

There are a lot of things that are valid on this site that aren't questions.

These include:

  • Bug reports
  • Feature requests
  • Stuff that you need to bring to attention to moderators (when flagging doesn't help)
  • Discussion about a topic
share|improve this answer
    
"saying that the question doesn't fit into any category that meta is for" That would be "off topic", no? –  BoltClock's a Unicorn May 8 '12 at 13:42
1  
@BoltClock'saUnicorn Yeah. My english isn't great. Somebody can edit that to whatever they want (don't vandalise it though). –  Anish Gupta May 8 '12 at 13:44
    
It's not an issue with language, but if something doesn't fit what meta is intended for, what else would it be if not "off topic"? –  BoltClock's a Unicorn May 8 '12 at 13:45
    
@BoltClock'saUnicorn Good point. I was thinking almost the same thing when I was writing it. I was hoping someone would edit that to make it sound better. But I'll just delete it now. –  Anish Gupta May 8 '12 at 13:47
    
If this is the argument, then "not constructive" could be applied for all the discussions, as it says, "this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion." I expect the community to choose the right closing reason for the right questions; differently, questions that are on-topic could be closed as off-topic. –  kiamlaluno May 8 '12 at 13:48
    
@BoltClock'saUnicorn Is discussion valid in Meta SO? –  Anish Gupta May 8 '12 at 13:52
    
@kiamlaluno It's basically copied from SO. I believe that you are allowed discussion in MSO. There is a discussion tag for that. It should be changed. –  Anish Gupta May 8 '12 at 13:55
    
@Anish Gupta: Sure. –  BoltClock's a Unicorn May 8 '12 at 13:58
    
@kiamlaluno: See meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107073/… –  BoltClock's a Unicorn May 8 '12 at 13:59
    
@moguzalpenel_hak I meant that bit which had something like "maybe it should be changed to [...]". –  Anish Gupta May 8 '12 at 14:01
    
@BoltClock'saUnicorn I have read that before. What I am arguing here is the argument used in this answer. –  kiamlaluno May 8 '12 at 14:01
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .