What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

The original boat programming question very well known on Stack Overflow, and is now used as an expression to refer to any question that has nothing to do with programming, but is written as "as a programmer..."

However, the original boat programming question was deleted, and therefor is only viewable to users with over 10k rep.

My question is, why was the Original boat programming question deleted instead of being historically locked? That seems like it would be the appropriate thing for the question.

A historical lock preserves older content that was very popular when it was originally posted, but is now off-topic or otherwise out of scope for the site it is posted on. Historically locking a post ends the debate over whether a question should be kept on the site or deleted, and is often the final state of a question that has been deleted and undeleted more than once.

Can it be un-deleted and historically locked? I think it would be nice to be able to see the actual question that everybody is referencing.

share|improve this question
10  
The question was hard deleted, so it is not viewable to users with over 10k rep. No one can view the actual question, although there are screenshots of it linked in some meta posts. –  ughoavgfhw May 7 '12 at 22:14
1  
I agree that it should be un-deleted and historically locked, hard deletion be damned! With some effort I'm sure a mostly-accurate copy of the question could be reconstructed and inserted back into the database, albeit with votes missing. It must be done, for the integrity of the site! –  Jeremy Banks May 7 '12 at 22:29
    
I'm not sure why people are downvoting. I know on meta you can downvote because you disagree with a post, but it would be nice for people to at least comment as to why they disagree. Is it that they think it can't be done, or because they think it shouldn't be done? –  Ephraim May 7 '12 at 23:07
3  
I just arrived here for the first time, but I'd guess the downvotes are because you brought back a topic that has already been discussed exhaustively. –  Pops May 8 '12 at 0:28
    
Actually, I downvoted because I strongly disagree that this question is worth having around. I don't think the "historical lock" feature should be cheapened by using it to keep around pure joke questions. –  Cody Gray May 8 '12 at 3:23
1  
@TheEstablishment - "I don't think the "historical lock" feature should be cheapened by using it to keep around pure joke questions." - What exactly would you call this? –  Ephraim May 8 '12 at 3:36
2  
Wow, you found one example of a question that probably shouldn't have received historical lock treatment in the first place! What exactly does that provide? Nothing. Yes, to be clear, I'm against that one, too. Post a question advocating it's deletion, and I'll upvote it. –  Cody Gray May 8 '12 at 3:37
3  
I can't subtract enough votes from this request...this is StackOverflow not Reddit (re: /r/IAmA/Boat-Programming-Aficionado). –  user7116 May 8 '12 at 14:42
1  
@Ephraim RE: What's your favorite “programmer” cartoon?... Please don't. Part of the reason that the Historical Lock exists is to end the debate. The Programmer Cartoon question was debated ad nauseum, and it differs from the "Boat Programming" post in that it is actually a legitimate (if off-topic) question, not a prank. See also Stack Overflow is not a perfect model of its guidelines –  Robert Harvey May 8 '12 at 21:11
    
@ughoavgfhw - I found one!! –  Ephraim May 8 '12 at 23:59
    
That question was referenced in the Stack Overflow podcast, episode 50, from 1 h 02 min 43 secs. It can be seen at can be seen at web.archive.org/web/20100426125115/http://www.mattmcdole.com/… and kaeding.name/articles/2009/05/01/programming-at-sea. –  Peter Mortensen Jan 30 at 20:18

3 Answers 3

up vote 26 down vote accepted

The boat programming question was not just deleted - it was actually removed from the database.

There's a long and sad story behind it, but most of it is has been covered in the question you linked. Suffice it to say that there's nothing even I can do about it now, even if I wanted to.

However, as mentioned in the linked question, you can still find an archived version of dubious quality if you wish.

share|improve this answer
    
If the issue was with Atwood's answer, why not just delete Atwood's answer. –  Cole Johnson Oct 9 '13 at 22:43
3  
@ColeJohnson: Are you still bothered about it? It was hard-deleted years ago by someone who no longer works at SE. It was unprecedented, it has not happened since, and it is not likely to ever happen again. The question is no more. It has ceased to be. It's expired and gone to meet its maker. It's a stiff. Bereft of life, it rests in peace. Its metabolic processes are a matter of interest only to historians. It's off the twig. It's kicked the bucket, it's shuffled off this mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. It is an ex-question! –  mmyers Oct 9 '13 at 23:06
    
No I'm not bothered by it. I was just wondering. -_- –  Cole Johnson Oct 9 '13 at 23:12

Because this part wasn't fulfilled:

The post is contentious; i.e. it has been closed and reopened at least once, or deleted and undeleted at least once

Basically, people have to actively fight for a question, the community has to be shown to be divided over it. Historical locking is thus a way to placate the two sides; if there aren't two sides, then it doesn't get used.

Also, possibly because it doesn't fill this criteria:

Does this question teach me anything that could make me better at my job? Can I learn something from it?

share|improve this answer
5  
That requirement almost certainly would have been fulfilled, but for the deletion that mmyers notes... –  Shog9 May 7 '12 at 22:43
    
@Shog9 - Is there anyway it can be re-created from a (really really old) backup? –  Ephraim May 7 '12 at 22:57
1  
@Ephraim: if a backup that old even exists (and that's hardly a given), it's a pretty good bet no one knows where it is. Stack Overflow was a very different beast back in the spring of '09... –  Shog9 May 7 '12 at 23:31
    
This makes me sad..... :( –  Ephraim May 7 '12 at 23:54
4  
wolfrevokcats.com/… –  phwd May 8 '12 at 1:19
1  
@Ephraim: Don't look now, but I'm almost positive that Mr. Forum was trolling you. That question adds zero value to the site, and arguably decreases and cheapens the value of our existing content. There's a reason it was hard deleted and removed from the database. Even if it could be rescued by the team, I'm willing to be that none of them would be interested. –  Cody Gray May 8 '12 at 3:25
    
@TheEstablishment - I'm confused, am I missing something? Who's "Mr. Forum"? and what does it mean "he's trolling me"? –  Ephraim May 8 '12 at 4:10
    
@Ephraim The guy who left this comment. And "trolling you" means he's being ironic. He's saying the opposite of what he really means/thinks. It's intentionally hyperbolic, which is the dead giveaway. –  Cody Gray May 8 '12 at 4:10
4  
@shog it would no more have met that criteria than "How would I program on the moon?" or any other {insert absurd location here}. Wasn't asked in good faith. blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/04/joke-questions-please-refrain Also, the "picture" of the boat was sourced to a local Richmond, CA marina (oddly enough) and the IP of the asker didn't remotely match that, either. –  Jeff Atwood May 8 '12 at 8:06
1  
@Jeff: I was referring more to the "contentious" requirement (which it seems is at least part of what got it featured in the podcast to begin with). –  Shog9 May 8 '12 at 14:07
8  
@shog NOT THAT IM BITTER OR ANYTHING –  Jeff Atwood May 8 '12 at 17:21
1  
@TheEstablishment Half ironic. Ideally, I would like to see it restored -- at least put back into the database for 10kers. However, I know that from the staff's perspective it's a ridiculous suggestion, so... –  Jeremy Banks May 8 '12 at 20:14
2  
@Jeff: Wait a minute.... How would I program on the moon? –  Jon Ericson May 8 '12 at 23:58

Maybe I'm dense, or just too literalistic, but I believe the answer to your question is that it wasn't historically locked because at the time of deletion historical locks didn't exist.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .