Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Hey, Why not having a microblogging service for not-that-meaningful questions or updates?

Like, right now I'd like to ask 'wtf python.org is down?'. I have eventually found the answer by searching on search.twitter.com but I do think the StackOverflow community is just amazing and I'd love to use such a microblogging service.

share|improve this question
9  
Lucky you have one rep because the outcome of this won't be good – Ian Elliott Aug 7 '09 at 23:17
3  
Pointing out that sites are down at a particular point (5 mins, an hour, a day?) in time is best left to twitter or downforeveryoneorjustme.com :) – Legooolas Aug 7 '09 at 23:30

Stack Overflow is not a social networking site. It's not going to become a social networking site. Jeff has been pretty clear on this.

Listen to the latest podcast (1:00:52):

Jeff: ... I kind of like having control over what I think the product is and what we're building and the direction of it, and I don't want to be pulled in like ten different directions in terms of "Hey let's make it a social networking site" - that would be like a horror story for me - that's everything I don't want, right? But if you open source, somebody could fork you and say "You know what, I'm going to make the ultra-social Facebook version of Stack Overflow" - I'm getting an ulcer just thinking about this actually - where you can friend people and, you know, you can send little private messages to each other and it's all about hanging out and being buddies - it's horrible!

Joel: Don't give 'em any ideas.

I understand that what you're asking for isn't quite that, but it's pretty darned close - and would almost certainly be used in that way, even if it was really designed for just time-sensitive quick programming-related questions/updates.

Nope, I can't see this happening...

share|improve this answer
    
earlier today there was a question on StackOverflow about programmers diet, it was closed and I can understand why but I do think StackOverflow could have a place for such topics – Saggi Malachi Aug 7 '09 at 23:26
2  
@Saggi: It could, but it shouldn't. – gnostradamus Aug 7 '09 at 23:31
1  
@Saggi: If you want to set up a StackExchange server for such things then go ahead when it's released... but it sounds like the amount of interesting content vs noise would be pretty grim. – Jon Skeet Aug 7 '09 at 23:41

If you want something twitter-like, use twitter.

'Nuf said.

share|improve this answer

You want... What now?

If that Twitter thing is useful - and i'm not yet convinced it is - then just use it. What do you need SO for?

If Twitter doesn't do what you need, then why on earth would a SO-branded clone be any better?

share|improve this answer

uh...if we wanted twitter-like clutter and noise, perhaps we'd...use twitter!

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .