Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I think the problem with stackoverflow is that inactive users get their experience as well.

E.g. If I ask some good questions or if I provide some good answers, I don't have to do anything next x years and I will get many points and badges despite of the fact, that I am not visiting the website at all.

share|improve this question
3  
Not always..... By the way, what do you want to ask? – Tabrez Ahmed May 21 '12 at 13:51
4  
I would think a good question or answer deserves up-votes even if the user is not connected. – Brady May 21 '12 at 13:51
7  
Why do you think this is a problem ? – AakashM May 21 '12 at 13:52
16  
Is someone trying to mess with my comfortable SO rep pension? That's dangerous, man. I know people. – Pëkka May 21 '12 at 13:53
1  
Now I understand that you do not want to make users dependent on it. The great value lies in the content only. – PaN1C_Showt1Me May 21 '12 at 14:35

The emphasis is on content and not users.

A highly voted post would suggest good content regardless of the OP's visitation frequency...

Even if a user is deleted from the system, his/her contributions will still be available.

Here is an example of this - How can I convert a hexadecimal number to base 10 efficiently in C?
( looking for a better example of a quality post if any one can help out please...)

I might pop in every other Friday to make a contribution but should my contribution be worth less because I am not a frequent visitor of the site?

Disclosure - I am frequently here though...

share|improve this answer
1  
If the emphasis is on content, then it is alright. Because if it wasn't the case, users must have been losing their 'experience' – PaN1C_Showt1Me May 21 '12 at 14:33
    
@mrl - Agreed, luckily its always Friday in Iceland... – Lix May 21 '12 at 14:42

It is absolutely acceptable. We people see movie producers producing movies out of public demand, or a novelist writing great novels. If they are good, people accept them whole heartedly even decades after their release. That's how it is. If you ask a great question or post a great answer, you'll be praised for ever.

And mind you!!! This is not the case in just Stack Overflow, or other SE sites, This is a global human behaviour.

share|improve this answer
    
I think you are comparing incomparable. A movie / novel is an art. IT is changing. It must be held actual. Questions should be updated and improved. – PaN1C_Showt1Me May 21 '12 at 14:39
1  
@PaN1C_Showt1Me: I really don't think so. Everything in this world is comparable to every other thing in some or the other way.... Here, I compare movies/novels and questions/answers because both of them are popular and liked only if their concept is new and creative, no matter if they are art or technology... – Tabrez Ahmed May 21 '12 at 14:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .