I just noticed the new wording for closed questions, which I happen to like, because it encourages the user to improve their post. Example:
Questions on Stack Overflow are expected to relate to programming or software development within the scope defined in the FAQ. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about closed questions here.
Another example, the "Not Constructive" close reason:
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, see the FAQ for guidance.
Notice that the links point to the "Close" portion of the FAQ, which merely restates the close reason wording that has been inserted into the OP's post. The user has already seen this information, and is shown all of the other close reasons, which have no relevance in the context of the OP's post.
The real information for improving his post is located on this page. To get there, the user has to click on the original link in his question, and then click on another link to get to the page that tells him how to fix his post.