Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Lately I have come across several questions where the users have posted code that has trivial syntax errors such as missing a semicolon ;.

And I got a feeling that it is not that they have not got it if they have reviewed their questions once before posting on SO.

I want to flag them low quality but since the language defining this term goes something like this severe content problems..., I am never sure if I am flagging correctly.

So, first, should such trivial mistakes considered low quality and if yes, I think the definition for low quality should be modified a bit!

These made me lose my temper today: C: reading if Char being typed is in array and printing something else and else is unexpected?

share|improve this question
That's not "very low quality", that's a typo. Comment and ask them to fix it, or edit minor things in yourself. Trivial mistakes do not a poor answer make. – Ryan O'Hara Jun 6 '12 at 3:29
Note that the flag is not "low quality", it's "very low quality". The former feels a whole lot different than the latter. Even if I hadn't read the extended description you mention above, I'd know that a missing semicolon doesn't qualify. – Michael Petrotta Jun 6 '12 at 3:47
I think asking them to fix it is ok as if I edit the question that is the solution. – Ankit Jun 6 '12 at 3:48
Related: When to use the flag "low quality"? – Palec Feb 18 '14 at 1:02
up vote 8 down vote accepted

A "Very Low Quality" question is one that cannot be salvaged by editing. That means that the quality problems are so severe that you can't figure out what the OP's intent is.

Raising a flag is akin to requesting a close. As irate as I get over spelling and grammatical errors (they are an indicator of laziness if they occur too frequently), they are seldom a valid reason to close, unless they make the question unintelligible.

share|improve this answer
is there an alternative way to deal with such mistakes as missing semicolons or it is a burden destined for reviewers and moderators. :P – Ankit Jun 6 '12 at 3:46
If it doesn't change the meaning of the question, @Ankit (maybe the missing semicolon is the cause of all the OP's problems, after all), then fix it! – Michael Petrotta Jun 6 '12 at 3:48
Hi Robert, I think it is important to recognize that sometimes spelling and grammar issues are due to language barriers/education/opportunities and are not always an indicator of laziness. If the person is from a native English speaking country, then I'm inclined to agree; otherwise, it may be because he/she is doing the best he/she can. I want to emphasize that we should all use judgement when reviewing posts with these particular issues, as I've seen some of them turn around into decent questions with some editing. – jmort253 Jun 6 '12 at 5:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .