What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Introduce a “general reference” close reason

I won't repeat older discussions, everything's been said.

However, people have been developing the trend of closing these questions as too localized. I don't think that'll do, and we (the 5k+ club) will always find a way to close these questions.

I am not favoring or defending such behavior, but those questions need to be closed, and there isn't (currently) an adequate way of closing them!

I'm obviously referring to questions whose sane answer would be "Go and read the manual please".

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Ben Brocka, Mark Trapp, Nick Craver Jun 9 '12 at 22:48

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
I agree, but it's been pretty firmly declined: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86043/… –  Pëkka Jun 9 '12 at 21:08
    
Why won't that do? –  Robert Harvey Jun 9 '12 at 21:08
    
@RobertHarvey: Because these questions are not localized, wanting to sort and array is a completely valid question, it's just easily solvable using RTFM. –  Second Rikudo Jun 9 '12 at 21:09
2  
Wait, this wasn't implemented in the end? I thought it was: blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/02/are-some-questions-too-simple –  Ziv Jun 9 '12 at 21:10
    
@Pekka: That's not the same reason. –  Second Rikudo Jun 9 '12 at 21:10
    
@Ziv: No, that was declined eventually, too much abuse potential. –  Second Rikudo Jun 9 '12 at 21:11
2  
@Ziv No, the general reference reason was not implemented beyond some beta sites and it seems they decided to kill it. Truth: What? Abuse potential? Is "RTFM" somehow less abusive than "General reference"? –  Matthew Read Jun 9 '12 at 21:11
2  
Minutes 14:00–20:00+ in Stack Exchange Podcast #20 are related and worth a listen for why very simple questions are at least tolerated on Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange. –  user149432 Jun 9 '12 at 21:17
    
What is RTFM? :) –  bluefeet Jun 9 '12 at 23:09
    
@blue Read The <Rhymes With Trucking> Manual :p –  Manishearth Jun 10 '12 at 2:13
    
Thank you for bringing this topic to meta again, because that's something that keeps working with me. –  hakre Jun 10 '12 at 10:29

1 Answer 1

up vote 14 down vote accepted

No, thank you.

We have enough close reasons already. If the question is easily answered by a Google Search, just flag it, or vote to close as "Not a Real Question."

Too Localized is sometimes used under the theory that questions on Stack Overflow should be of interest to at least one other programmer. Questions that can be easily answered by a Google search are not of interest to anyone here.

share|improve this answer
    
So... close them as too localized? –  Second Rikudo Jun 9 '12 at 21:14
    
That's what I do. –  Robert Harvey Jun 9 '12 at 21:15
5  
Or as a duplicate of a more helpful/general question that covers the same ground (a LOT of these basic questions get asked so often there's already a good dupe), but finding dupes is harder. –  Ben Brocka Jun 9 '12 at 21:16
    
How should we flag such questions with the current flag reasons? For example, this question is solved by simply looking at the MSDN documentation for TimeSpan. Flagging it for moderator attention seems a bit excessive, but it's the only flagging reason that allows a comment. –  Stijn Sep 9 '13 at 14:15
    
@Stijn: That question looks fine to me. In any case, the answer to your question is close as "Questions asking for code must demonstrate a minimal understanding of the problem being solved." –  Robert Harvey Sep 9 '13 at 15:03

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .