Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Is there a common way to work with obsolete tags?

E.g. tag was created to mark questions about JavaFX 1.x which become obsolete technology. New JavaFX2 is totally not compatible and even uses another language (Java instead of FX Script).

So FX1.3 questions has almost no value for FX2 users. And 99% of new questions tagged are about JavaFX 2 .

It it possible batch rename tag to and making tag a synonym of ?

Or other common approach for such situations.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Monica Cellio, Martijn Pieters, Al E., Shadow Wizard, Hugo Dozois Aug 27 '14 at 3:40

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Monica Cellio, Martijn Pieters, Al E., Shadow Wizard, Hugo Dozois
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I doubt your 99% number, according to a search for the javafx tag sorted by 'newest', 5+ pages of questions were posted after August 2011 when FX2 was created, and 6+ pages were posted before August 2011 and therefore can't be about javafx-2. There are some 588 questions about javafx, so it's on the high side of a manual retag. It would help considerably if those older than August 2011 could be converted automatically... – Kevin Vermeer Jun 13 '12 at 17:19
Sorry if I wasn't clear then I said "99% of new questions". By "new" I meant smth like "this year". – Sergey Grinev Jun 13 '12 at 19:11
Ah, my bad - missed the 'new' qualification. – Kevin Vermeer Jun 13 '12 at 19:16
np, and thanks for suggestion -- if older than August 2011 questions would be autoconverted I can sort the rest manually. – Sergey Grinev Jun 13 '12 at 20:53
The ambiguous situation still persists. The recommendation in the tag wiki of javafx is not clear about when the different tags should be used. And moreover, it should also be clear for people who do not read the wiki. – Jens Piegsa Dec 6 '13 at 1:06