Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I noticed some users absing the tag. Linking to jsfiddle code. Therefore making a case for perhaps removing the tag .

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, Scimonster, Braiam, Monica Cellio, gnat Dec 22 '14 at 20:42

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, Scimonster, Braiam, Monica Cellio, gnat
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I actually cleaned up this tag a while ago, leaving only around 10 questions left with it. There are some valid questions about jsFiddle that deserve the tag. jsFiddle is a programming tool and there are some cases where it can be difficult or confusing for some people using it, so questions about it are valid. However, the tag is widely misused to indicate "I have a jsFiddle example in my question."

So, yes it is useful, and yes, it does appear to need cleaning again.

share|improve this answer
So about 7 % of the tag is valid (141 tags total). If jsfiddle is in the title and the question is tagged javascript the relevant questions would still be searchable. – r4. Jun 14 '12 at 19:24
93% is abuse, I'd say revove the tag. – r4. Jun 14 '12 at 19:24
@OlofEdler Searchable, but not in the same way. Maybe if the popup/etc. had info saying not to use it just because you made a fiddle? – Dave Newton Jun 14 '12 at 19:25
@Olof: That was also back when the tag only had ~30 questions to begin with. Going through it now, there are a decent number of questions that use the tag appropriately. – animuson Jun 14 '12 at 19:25
@animuson. If the tag was renamed to [jsfiddle-page] the tag would likely be less abused. I think now it can't be many questions not already asked that really deserve the tag [jsfiddle]. – r4. Jun 14 '12 at 19:37
Perhaps the tag wiki excerpt could open with something explicitly indicating that the tag should be used for asking questions about how to use the jsFiddle application? Might help (if anyone ever reads the excerpts before just clicking that tag). – jadarnel27 Jun 14 '12 at 20:17

To vote on. If you like me think the tag is mostly useless. And you don't see the point of keeping it since people abuse it.

share|improve this answer
Don't worry, this is meta, we'll vote on your question instead :) – Frédéric Hamidi Jun 14 '12 at 20:16

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .