Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates
share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Gilles, Martijn Pieters, MichaelT, gnat, Monica Cellio Sep 17 '14 at 19:09

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Gilles, Martijn Pieters, Community, gnat, Monica Cellio
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Wouldn't it be faster to just retag those 11 questions and drop [byteordermark]? Anything against it? – PeeHaa Jun 14 '12 at 20:25
Nothing against it. (Though I still think it would be a nice idea to set up a synonym.) – stakx Jun 14 '12 at 21:00
I dunno. Considering the fact that most questions already are tagged [bom] and of the ones who are tagged [byteordermark] most of them also have BOM in the title. – PeeHaa Jun 14 '12 at 21:08
up vote 8 down vote accepted

My preference would be to rename to , and make a synonym of . (Note: this requires moderator intervention.) Clarity trumps use count. is clear in a context where Unicode is implied but is obscure on the scale of the big world of programming, stands on its own.

Keep in mind that if someone wants to use for some other purpose (we live in a world of TLAs), they will easily notice that they're using the wrong tag if it's rewritten to . Having the synonym in the other direction isn't helpful in this way.

share|improve this answer
I was thinking the same thing. I'll wait until next week to see if there's any good arguments against, if not I'll fix it up. Remind me to revisit on Wednesday if it's not done by then :) – Kev Jun 15 '12 at 1:35
@Kev Come back Wednesday to check this out =) – saluce Jun 15 '12 at 3:48
I would rather see [bom] being used since that is what most people will refer to. Just check the amount of questions tagged bom and the amount of questions tagged byteordermark. IMHO in this specific case the TLA is justified. – PeeHaa Jun 15 '12 at 17:47
@PeeHaa If someone types bom in the tag box they'll get the right tag. If someone sees byte-order-mark they'll understand what it's about. It's a win-win situation. Going by use count is usually the right thing when the two forms are about equally clear, but this isn't the case here. – Gilles Jun 15 '12 at 21:54
@Kev Come back last Wednesday to check this out =) – Gilles Jun 22 '12 at 0:26
It's now Wednesday evening and the tag synonym has been made. – Gilles Sep 17 '14 at 18:16

I would go the other way: Retag all questions as .

is ambiguous as it could mean "bill of materials". Although it is not likely to be used this way on SO very often, it will confuse some programmers (those who work closely with electronic engineers for example.)

share|improve this answer
I agree, and I think @Gilles' answer covers this point already. I also like the recommendation of adding hyphens: [byte-order-mark]. – stakx Jun 19 '12 at 12:24

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .