Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When a user performs multiple self-deletes on answers he has provided, the Community User flags them in the 10K/mod queue.

However, sometimes these users are simply getting rid of low-quality posts.
I think that it would be a good idea to limit these automatic flags to cases where the self deletion occurs on a post with a score of >=1.

share|improve this question
Hm, probably you should just decline Community's bad flags with a custom decline message, explaining the situation. I've heard she's a fast learner. – Yannis Jun 24 '12 at 13:16
I'd decline it with a nice ascii trollface, but a single-line edit box is not really good for this :p – ThiefMaster Jun 24 '12 at 13:17
How often do these "self deletion" flags get raised? – Lix Jun 24 '12 at 13:49
@Lix: Not too often, but it happens regularly. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Jun 24 '12 at 14:32
@YannisRizos I have never known Community is a she. Now, somebody could say "picture, or it has never happened." ;) – kiamlaluno Jun 24 '12 at 16:12
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I am not a mod, nor a 10Ker. My opinions here are solely based upon my experience on the site and my interactions with more veteran users and moderators.

I disagree with you for these reasons -

A theory once mentioned to me about flagging by a certain moderator states that it's better to raise an ultimately un-needed flag than it is to not raise a flag at all. It's better to mark a flag as "unhelpful" than it is to miss a post really in need of a flag...

I agree with you that self deletion is very possibly a responsible action by a responsible user trying to keep the site clean but without manually verifying the deletion it would be impossible to differentiate a clean-up effort from rage quitting (where a user goes through all his content and deletes his/her posts)...

IMO, it would be "safer" to leave this functionality intact and leave the "decision making" to the human exception handlers.

share|improve this answer

However, sometimes users simply get rid of low-quality posts so I think it would be a good idea to only raise this flag if answers with a score >=1 were deleted.

I don't think "Nobody upvoted this." is a reliable indicator for low quality. Nobody upvoted it yet.

I have a couple of answers with a score of 0 that I know to be correct and potentially helpful. The first upvote might come after quite some time, and the answer help somebody eventually.

However, I think little of what I said above applies to answers that have been downvoted. Raising the flag only if answers with a non-negative score or old answers with a positive score have been deleted sounds better to me.

share|improve this answer
Similarly, one downvote or one upvote is also not the best indication... – Lix Jun 24 '12 at 14:08
A single vote isn't a reliable indicator for anything, but I think good answers with a score of -1 are far less common. And you can't really blame somebody for getting rid of all the answers that cost him reputation... – Dennis Jun 24 '12 at 14:17
Good answers with a score of -1 are about as common as strategic dowvoters... I guess it all depends on the situation... – Lix Jun 24 '12 at 14:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .