Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I know that reputation gains from bounties and the accepted answer bonus are excluded from the rep cap of 200 per day and can see why this makes sense.

But why is the +2 gained from accepting an answer also excluded from the cap? This makes less sense to me.

share|improve this question
It wouldn't be fair to give answerers extra rewards without also doing the same for askers. – BoltClock's a Unicorn Jun 25 '12 at 14:38
I'd think it's so that you accept answers naturally, rather than all at once when you need to push yourself up to the cap. – Matthew Read Jun 25 '12 at 14:38

You control when you accept an answer.

It makes little sense to make those 2 points count towards the cap, as it will result in strategic accepting.

share|improve this answer
True, also keep in mind there is limit on how many questions you can ask per day (6 maybe?) so the cap is very little anyway. – Shadow Wizard Jun 25 '12 at 14:40

What's the purpose of including accepting answers in the cap? If anything, you want to encourage people to accept answers whenever they can. Including this would only discourage people from accepting answers when they want.

The purpose of the cap is to keep power users from gaining too much reputation from older posts. Accepting answers is very unlikely to have that sort of reputation swing for any user.

share|improve this answer

Both the +15 and +2 are for accepted answers; in the first case, the reputation is given to who answers, and in the second case, the reputation is given to who accepts the answer.

There is just one accepted answer per question; so, reputation from accepted answers cannot pile up as with reputation from votes. In such cases, it makes sense to exempt the reputation from accepted answer from the reputation cap, also because it is more probable that (generally) most of the reputation comes from votes.

I think that including the +2 in the reputation cap would be a bad idea, if that would cause users to wait accepting an answer for when they don't gain enough reputation, which could also be an excuse for not accepting answers.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .