What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

The tag was burninated by Jeff Atwood during the Great Tag Cleanup of 2012.

Since then, it's been recreated nearly every other day by people with enough reputation, but not enough tagging skill. Once created, it'll be used by the clueless a dozen times a day, literally.

It's a horrible tag teetering on the edge of being a meta tag: It can't stand alone, and it can mean something different to different people.

I've been nuking it almost every day for the past three months, and it's getting old. It's time for the blacklist.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Undo, Martijn Pieters, ChrisF, ɥʇǝS, Emrakul May 9 at 19:39

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Undo, Martijn Pieters, ChrisF, ɥʇǝS, Emrakul
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

3  
Wait, so what you are saying is that Jeff Atwood is actually Trogdor? Mind = Blown! –  Richard J. Ross III Jul 15 '12 at 18:06
8  
Should client also be burninated? I assume this has the same reasoning –  Mark Jul 15 '12 at 21:44
3  
Why are you burning the client? They are innocent. Wait... tag? Burn it. –  nhahtdh Jul 17 '12 at 4:32
3  
How about blacklisting these, too: column, sum, row group, percent, taken from here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/134267/… –  Lukas Eder Jul 17 '12 at 7:02
    
@RichardJ.RossIII burnination by Jeff (or another mod) is actually a pretty common concept around these parts. Here's one example of many. –  Pops Aug 24 '12 at 18:40
1  
@nhahtdh, no client is ever innocent... –  ben is uǝq backwards Aug 25 '12 at 7:43
    
if-statment is one I see all the time, as well. –  David Sep 9 '12 at 22:35
    
@benisuǝqbackwards - damn it –  LittleBobbyTables Apr 10 '13 at 20:57
    
@Blah: Zero questions tagged server. [status-meh] –  Robert Harvey Apr 10 '13 at 21:01
1  
12 minutes ago, another one. Just got rid of it. –  Asad Apr 10 '13 at 21:49
1  
@Robert 2 more now. I am on mobile so it's too cumbersome to remove but I'm just saying - this needs to go forever –  Doorknob Apr 10 '13 at 22:23
    
Meh, I've given up with the blacklist happening. It's on my ever-growing list of 30+ tags I check regularly to ensure that they remain dead, including such gems as conversion, computer, multiple, visual, studio, etc... –  Charles Apr 10 '13 at 23:45
    
Are you on holiday :-(... it's winning at the moment; I can't keep it clean for an entire 24 hour period without someone using it when I'm asleep or something. –  ben is uǝq backwards Jul 21 '13 at 16:12
    
@benisuǝqbackwards I only check two or three times day. It's managed to be recreated a few days in a row this past week, judging from the number of times I've had to put back in the "DO NOT USE THIS TAG" wiki. My list of 30 in April is now up to 59... –  Charles Jul 21 '13 at 22:15

1 Answer 1

It's a horrible tag teetering on the edge of being a meta tag. It can't stand alone, and it can mean something different to different people.

Ok, I don't get the meta-tag bit. Are there waiters/waitresses posting questions and using this tag?

The "different meanings" thing is clear enough though. So... What should it mean? Is there one meaning among many that makes sense on SO?

share|improve this answer
1  
Maybe because it is too broad that it doesn't make the tag any more useful than a meta-tag? –  nhahtdh Aug 25 '12 at 3:07
1  
Hmm... Yeah, maybe if folks are using it in the sense of, "my code runs on a server - better throw that tag in!" Of course, that's also the dirty little secret of, say, most c# questions. –  Shog9 Aug 25 '12 at 3:31
2  
I've counted at least three distinct meanings, all of them bad: 1) Combined with client when they meant to tag it client-server, 2) "it runs on a server" / "I'm connecting to a MySQL server", and 3) "I'm writing a server". Oh, and sql+server, which != sql-server. In any case, it's basically bait for people that have no tagging skill. The last one might have some possible validity, but ... eh. –  Charles Aug 25 '12 at 21:24
1  
It's a generic tag. "Hey, my code's on the server, let's add the [server] tag". It doesn't enhance the question at all. If it sticks around, does that mean we can have [laptop] and [pc] tags as well? Aw, crap they already exist! Burn them too! –  LittleBobbyTables Apr 10 '13 at 20:43
2  
Server can mean, in rough decreasing order of technical-ness, 1) the server end of a client/server relationship, 2) a listener on an e.g. TCP port, 3) a machine in a room that a server admin makes sure is secure and doesn't catch on fire and stuff, 4) a machine in the cloud, 5) a long-running program that responds to requests. Note in particular load-balanced architectures de-couple (5) and (2). –  djechlin Apr 10 '13 at 21:03
2  
Okay. I admit it. Meta has me confused. There's an extended statement as a question, that has a couple of questions as an answer. –  Ben Barden Apr 10 '13 at 21:44

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .