What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Does it make sense to answer old questions?

I'm asking in general, but this question is what made me think about it. The accepted answer is perfectly correct, but since Python 3's os.makedirs function has the exists_ok flag that the python 2.x function does not.

This is the basic rationale I thought up for each position:

ANSWER: Since this is the first question that comes up for a google search for "python mkdir if not exist" and similar queries, it should have new information included. Otherwise, when similar questions are posted, users will close them as duplicates referring to this question, and the new information is never provided.

DON'T ANSWER: This question is quite old and thorough, so users are probably safe being directed to it. The relevant information could still be added as a comment.

Thoughts? I saw this question, but since the accepted answer is still correct, although not 100% complete, I still wanted to ask.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Pops, Ricardo Altamirano, Bill the Lizard Jul 17 '12 at 17:43

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
Important info really shouldn't be left as a comment unless it's just a minor correction to an existing answer –  Ben Brocka Jul 17 '12 at 15:55
    
I would propose asking a new question stating the version difference and self answering –  Serkan Arıkuşu Jul 17 '12 at 16:12
    
@SerkanArıkuşu I'm skeptical about that option, since I think I would most likely get results telling me to the read the documentation (which is fair, because it's a simple problem to solve by doing so). –  Ricardo Altamirano Jul 17 '12 at 16:14
    
@RicardoAltamirano If the information is all readily avaliable in documentation is it not showing up on the first page of the relevant query results? If it is, there's no need for a SO Q/A for it. If not, then self-answering a new question would benefit the internets. Same logic applies to answering the old one too. –  Servy Jul 17 '12 at 16:20
    
@Servy In my search, only the Python 2 documentation comes up in the first page, not the Python 3 documentation. Numerous duplicate SO questions come up, and I'm on the fourth page of search results and the python 3 documentation still has not appeared. –  Ricardo Altamirano Jul 17 '12 at 16:22
    
Numerous existing questions touch on this topic to varying degrees. –  Pops Jul 17 '12 at 16:30

1 Answer 1

up vote 8 down vote accepted

Behold, the Decision-Making Filter™:

  • If you think that your answer can help others as a solution to the problem, absolutely you should answer. One of the goals of Stack Overflow is to create an encyclopedia-like depository of information, that can be updated as things change.

  • If you don't really have an answer to the problem, but you think it's worth noting that something has significantly changed, edit the accepted answer.

  • If you think that your information is really just an afterthought, something that people should know exists, but isn't so significant that it's worth editing the answer, comment on the answer.

  • If you've gotten to this point in the Decision-Making Filter™, then your information is probably not worth putting on there.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .