Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I often see vandalism while reviewing edit suggestions. Most of these are submitted by anonymous users. Example

Is there a way for moderators to block these users? And do we really need anonymous edit suggestions?

share|improve this question
5  
Doesn't really matter. There are only a few every day. I'm more worried about subtly bad edits made by user with account being approved. – nhahtdh Jul 24 '12 at 7:51
2  
Isn't this why we have the review process in the first place? I would only consider stopping suggested edits from anonymous users if there are actual figures telling me that their suggestions end up being rejected a disproportionate amount of times. – Bart Jul 24 '12 at 7:57
    
@Bart, I have kept no stats, but I see >50% vandalism lately. – Toon Krijthe Jul 24 '12 at 8:00
    
Okay, if that's truly the case then it might be worth considering. – Bart Jul 24 '12 at 8:01
    
@Bart: From my experience, there are some good anon edits, but it pales in comparison to bad anon edits. (However, the point I made above is that anon edits are not that frequent anyway). – nhahtdh Jul 24 '12 at 8:02
    
@nhahtdh I review quite a lot as well and had a similar "feeling" but assumed it was me remembering the bad ones more than the good ones. That's why I'd like to see figures. – Bart Jul 24 '12 at 8:04
2  
You can check out the anonymous edits at: stackoverflow.com/tools/… - 998 this month, most seem to have been approved but a lot seem to be controversial (3 reviewers). Weirdly that's quite a different picture to: data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/60664/… – Flexo Jul 24 '12 at 8:33
3  
i'm still laughing at the suggested edit you gave as example:) – Aftnix Jul 24 '12 at 11:24
2  
@Flexo - When I do a quick count, there were 91 approved edits out of 244 for anonymous over the last week, for a 37% approval rate. The data.stackexchange.com query shows a 36% approval rate, so that seems to be a pretty good match to me. Those are not very good numbers. – Brad Larson Jul 24 '12 at 17:13
    
@BradLarson - it's not great but it's also not awful and as a percentage of the total submitted edits it's quite low (~3%) so blocking them wouldn't do much to keep the edit queue in shape. (However it settles after recent changes) – Flexo Jul 24 '12 at 17:17
1  
@Flexo - Yeah, and I've seen plenty more spam edits and attempted comments from named users than anonymous in my own experience. – Brad Larson Jul 24 '12 at 17:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .