Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When I hit "edit" on this question the editor shows the source not of the current revision, but the one before it.

I can reproduce this in multiple browsers, both logged in and anonymously and another user confirmed it in chat.

I found it originally via the new review queue, that much I'm certain of. I thought I'd backed out of an improve in the new review queue on this one and done it from the question page itself in the end, after it had already been approved but the timestamps in the revision history and the log on the suggested edit disagree there so I might be misremembering that.

share|improve this question
This is supposed to have been fixed but apparently it is not. – Aaron Bertrand Jul 24 '12 at 15:14
@AaronBertrand - I thought I remembered something recently, but search turned up nothing. – Flexo Jul 24 '12 at 15:18
possible duplicate of This question seems to have an unremovable tag – Jeremy Banks Jul 24 '12 at 15:19
Some more findings in the comments at Suggested edit comes after the improved one. – Arjan Jul 24 '12 at 15:46
I MESSED THIS UP, but in my defense coding is more fun drunk – Nick Craver Jul 24 '12 at 17:32
@GeoffDalgas I think you missed a status-completed. – Jeremy Banks Jul 24 '12 at 18:25
up vote 7 down vote accepted

This was a fun one to track down - it turned out to be a case where ordering revisions based only on creation date was somewhat of a bad idea. It only presented itself on a SQL instance with a high volume of inserts combined with a change that we made to sync up all post creation dates for an action such as improving a suggested edit which approves the existing suggested edit and inserts an additional edit all using the same exact date and time.

share|improve this answer
I'm not sure it is fixed. For the post discussed here, when I click the edit link on the post, I get the same "must be more substantial" notification and my edits are rejected (haven't tried a complete rewrite, perhaps that'd count as more substantial;). From the revisions page, I get the same source (rev 2) when clicking the edit link of either rev 2 or rev 3, and get a warning that I edit an old revision. – Daniel Fischer Jul 25 '12 at 18:08
However, anonymously suggesting an edit worked. What are the differences between the "improve this question" link for anonymous users and the edit link for logged-in users that one works but not the other? – Daniel Fischer Jul 25 '12 at 19:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .