What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

Looking at this revision to this question, the auto-generated edit reason is:

added 24 characters in body

However, when looking at the entire revision list, it's obvious that there are many more characters that were added in that revision:

Revision four with more than 24 characters.

Here's the Markdown diff as well:

Markdown diff

It would appear that 24 total characters were added in revision 2, and that edit reason was carried in revisions two through five:

Copied edit reason

share|improve this question
1  
If you look at revision 2, 24 is about right for added - deleted. Then for the next edits, that edit reason was kept in the bar since they were shortly after. –  Daniel Fischer Jul 24 '12 at 15:47
add comment

1 Answer 1

The edit reason was copied from the previous revision(s); revs 2 through 5 all have the same edit note, which was correct for revision 2.

revisions on question

The user must have kept clicking edit close to the 5 minute grace window, so the edit reason is prefilled to the previous revision.

To reproduce: create an edit outside the grace window, so you get a generated edit note. Then edit again, within a grace period, and you'll get the edit note copied. Wait with submitting until you are outside of the grace period; so do not submit your edit for 5 minutes. A new revision is created with the pre-filled edit note.

I am guessing this is .

share|improve this answer
    
This is obviously, incorrect (not your answer, but the system)... Perhaps I should bring this up into the question? –  casperOne Jul 24 '12 at 15:51
    
I've integrated this into the main bug. –  casperOne Jul 24 '12 at 15:53
    
When you edit a post shortly after your previous edit, or improve a suggested edit, the edit reason is automatically filled in with the previous. Unless you type a new one, the new revision gets the same as the previous. By design, probably. –  Daniel Fischer Jul 24 '12 at 15:55
    
It's not a bug; if you edit a post within the grace period, but do not complete it within that grace period, a new revision is created with the old edit note. –  Martijn Pieters Jul 24 '12 at 15:55
    
Well then the question is, what kind of edit could you make that should have the same edit summary as the previous? –  Toomai Jul 24 '12 at 15:58
    
@Toomai: an edit within the grace period, so any edits made within 5 minutes of the most recent revision. –  Martijn Pieters Jul 24 '12 at 15:59
    
If I add 10 chars, and then add 20 chars, it shouldn't matter whether you're in the grace period or not, a default "+10" for the second edit is flat-out wrong. –  Toomai Jul 24 '12 at 16:02
    
@Toomai: then suggest that SE detects that an edit comment defaulted to a previously generated text, and replace it. –  Martijn Pieters Jul 24 '12 at 16:03
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .