Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I appreciate the continuing hard work that the SE team is doing, and I recognize that there are some good features in the new, beta review system, but on balance I don't think it's better. To really do a decent job of reviewing a post, I have to click the link to open the page in a new tab, which means the new system is just one additional step that gets in the way (i.e., $A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C$, instead of $A \rightarrow C$). Several issues seem to be discussed elsewhere, so I won't re-hash them here. These are the points that I think are distinctive:

  • mathjax does not seem to be enabled, so it's much harder to read and understand the posts & associated comments
  • A bigger issue is that I can't really see the context of whatever I'm supposed to be judging. In terms of keeping the site clean and useable as a long-term repository of knowledge, pages need to be seen as users would see them: whole with the question at the top, all other answers and all the comments displayed. (Yes, I can click the link to open in a new tab, but why do I have to go through an intermediate page that I can't use?) For example, if I'm supposed to judge a low quality post, I can't see the other answers that have previously been offered. A brief answer that doesn't provide much informational context may or may not be useful for someone who comes to that page depending on what else is there, but I don't have access to that without going to the regular page.
share|improve this question
Do you have some examples? The only actions on low-quality answers are leave it, edit it, or delete it. Deletion should only be used for obviously bad stuff (definitely not "this is a duplicate of other information" or "there's a better answer"), so if there's any possibility of it being useful just leave it. – David Fullerton Aug 14 '12 at 16:24
I don't want to spend a lot of time hunting for examples. What is it you're unsure of, mathjax, or where it would've been helpful to have the context? (NB, for the latter I would say all, albeit only in a small number of cases will it be clearly vital.) As for the available options, styles differ I suppose; I'm reluctant to edit answers & prefer not to delete (at least at first). My standard approach is to comment based on what's going on on that page as a whole--such as the comments you suggest, which notably only make sense given the other A's, & possibly come back later to flag. – gung Aug 14 '12 at 17:15
Sorry, I didn't mean the mathjax. That's definitely a bug and will get fixed. – David Fullerton Aug 14 '12 at 18:51
up vote 2 down vote accepted

After the next build mathjax will be rendered on load of a review item.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .