What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

CasperOne's answer to Request to add a tag info page has reminded me of something I wanted to ask.

I recently rejected an edit to the tag wiki of . The tag didn't exist and it was a meta-tag anyway.

As there's no point creating tag wiki's for non-existent tags and it could lead to extra crap (technical term) coming into the system why not ban it altogether?

To quote from casperOne's answer, which gives a better description than "crap":

Because this tag would not have any actual questions associated with it, there's no reason to create a tag wiki for it.

Additionally, giving it a wiki would probably encourage people to actually start using the tag, and that's not good either, as the tag is undoubtedly a meta tag, which is also a no-go on the site.

share|improve this question
    
I would like to know, how such tags came into existence? Or have they been skipped from the moderation? Probably, this concern might have not been envisaged while creating them ;) –  mtk Aug 16 '12 at 20:00
    
Tag wikis are supposed to be automatically rejected when the tag they were suggested on is destroyed. Apparently this bug still exists. –  animuson Aug 16 '12 at 20:08
    
I wonder if the tag wiki actually sticks or just immediately gets orphaned. Tag wikis from deleted tags go to the orphanage. Either way you shouldn't be able to add/suggest them –  Ben Brocka Aug 16 '12 at 20:08
    
@BenBrocka, it appears to be orphaned looking at the rejected edit. –  ben is uǝq backwards Aug 16 '12 at 20:09
    
Huh, you could theoretically get rep just by getting these approved then, then probably just immediately resubmit the same edit since it gets orphaned. –  Ben Brocka Aug 16 '12 at 20:13
    
Anyone who actually bothers to do that probably deserves the rep... –  ben is uǝq backwards Aug 16 '12 at 20:14
    
Anyone who actually bothers to do that is going to incur the wrath of the New Tag Deletionist Cabal. Seriously though, tags don't actually stop existing until a few hours after they've been removed from their last question. I'm pretty sure that if we waited long enough, the wikis in the queue would disappear. For better or worse, the new edit queue interface has done an amazing job at keeping the queue down to a reasonable size, so we're unlikely to see this in action. –  Charles Aug 16 '12 at 20:18
    

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .