I had come up with what I thought was an interesting Python question ( Which line is chosen to be reported in exception ). Several people commented on the question (but it hadn't yet been answered), someone has answered a "consensus of the comments" (although I don't think this is actually their consensus).
The answerer then commented saying "the question should be closed as "non-constructive - As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or specific expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion."
I am upset by this response. My question is well-formed and I don't think it leads itself to any of these things in answers. However, this particular answer is lacking (references, facts, etc.).
Surely a question should not be closed because it hasn't yet been answered well?
Note: I still have hope that I can answer it myself, and am in the process of detailing an example.