Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Review-beta: Obviously good answer in low-quality

I like the new reviewing system (in beta). But today a "low quality post" puzzled me: http://stackoverflow.com/a/11606577/861716.

enter image description here


Why is this deemed "low quality"? It's got 7 upvotes, it's well-written and it's not evidently short (ugh). The heuristics don't seem to give any reason for it to stand out.

In general I think that the algorithm does a very good job, but this time it made me scratch my head.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Rory, Al E., jonsca, Nicol Bolas, Yannis Aug 20 '12 at 8:21

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

3  
Wait a min... there is a post regarding this... Here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/142998/… – nhahtdh Aug 19 '12 at 13:35
    
Ah good one! Duplicate then. – Gert Arnold Aug 19 '12 at 13:38
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Most likely, this doesn't perfectly answer your question sentence triggered false alert.

This should be a flip side of the script being capable to recognize garbage answers like

I know this doesn't answer the question but I am curious about how you did <something irrelevant>

This doesn't perfectly answer your question but I believe the best course of action in cases like this is to click Looks Good and move on.

share|improve this answer
    
The description says that it is flagged because of its length and content - which is not the case here, since the post is very long. It is more likely a test to see whether the reviewer is doing the job properly. – nhahtdh Aug 19 '12 at 13:41
1  
Well, content could be a reason if the algorithm is triggered by the sentence gnat points out. But I'm not sure if it is. I think the worst answers are those given by people who are not aware of it not being an answer. Anyway, I voted "looks good" and probably passed the test :). – Gert Arnold Aug 19 '12 at 13:44
    
@nhahtdh "and" in description wording is likely misleading; I wouldn't be surprised if it means to say "and/or" - resolving in our case to "content" part. Thing is, the only reasonable underlying heuristics that could be there should react to "content" part I mentioned – gnat Aug 19 '12 at 13:45
2  
@gnat: I just check the LQ queue to make sure. You are probably right. I think it doesn't bother whether it is just length, just content or both and slap the same message there. – nhahtdh Aug 19 '12 at 13:57

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .