Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

So let's say someone asks a question and you know an integral part of the answer, but not the whole thing. An example of one is this person was trying to make a scalable div with some styling. I knew how to do the javascript tidbit, but not the CSS. Would it be wrong of me to post my answer for the javascript but not the CSS? Technically I'm not solving his problem because the CSS portion that he wants to understand is not being answered much in my answer, but at the same time I don't want this to be a barrier for me to contribute something that I can help with.

Any thoughts are most appreciated.

EDIT: Also are there any thoughts on posting unfinished answers? Maybe you're posting part of an answer you want to finish later?

share|improve this question
You could say that if the question requires expertise in two domains, it is actually two questions and should be split. – Mat Aug 22 '12 at 10:28
@Mat Well not in the js/css case. – Anish Gupta Aug 22 '12 at 10:28
Would it be wrong to edit your awnser to a question if I knew the CSS portion? If the awnser is no, then I can't see why partial awnsers are wrong. This is a community afterall and not about scoring points. – Dpolehonski Aug 22 '12 at 10:37
If it may help someone, do it... – Ian Ringrose Aug 22 '12 at 13:08
up vote 11 down vote accepted

In my opinion it's OK and I will explain why.

  • Assuming you answer is good and correct, it has value for other people, even if not answering the whole original question.

  • The question author does not have to mark it accepted, he can upvote and comment "true, but I still need this and that"

  • Assuming other answer give the missing stuff without what you said, the OP can post his own answer combining both and accept it making it community wiki so that he won't gain reputation for contents not his own.

share|improve this answer
Or combine and not making it a community wiki. I still find that perfectly fine and in the spirit of the Creative Commons license, since he added value by combining the answers. Preferably he still upvotes the other two. – Emil Vikström Aug 22 '12 at 10:50
@Emil fair enough, I would make it CW and personally won't upvote such a self answer but if others find it useful then I won't stand in their way.. :) – Shadow Wizard Aug 22 '12 at 11:48
Jeff himself has said that a partial answer is better than no answer. It's also one of the purposes of Community Wiki. – Al E. Aug 22 '12 at 13:11
Ahh okay thanks so much. I thought so too :] – aug Aug 22 '12 at 19:13
Here's a great example of combining partial answers:… – mlai Oct 8 '14 at 3:45

I think it is perfectly fine to post partial answers. It may be possible to figure out the rest on your own, someone else may post the second part of the answer or you can go back to complete your answer later on.

share|improve this answer
Agreed, but if you knowingly provide a partial answer then you should state that explicitly along with your plans to provide (or not) the complete answer eventually or with an invitation for others to complete your answer. – Chris Gerken Aug 31 '12 at 15:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .