Here's the question in question (sorry).

Is this some sort of default that happens approximately a week after a mod locks a question but doesn't take any further action?

share|improve this question
3  
Perhaps it was locked down for a week to calm down whatever situation was happening at that moment in time. This lock might have simply expired. –  Bart Sep 10 '12 at 17:26
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Yes, some of the locks we set are temporary and will automatically expire after a set period of time. This time of expiry is hidden from users, though.

Not every lock is temporary; we can choose to lock a post permanently (until it's manually unlocked) as well. Again, whether a post is locked temporarily or for good is not disclosed to users.

share|improve this answer
    
Is there also a hidden reason? –  Matt Fenwick Sep 10 '12 at 17:29
    
@Matt Fenwick: The lock reason is displayed as a notice during the duration of the lock, and reflected in a summary in the post's revision history. –  BoltClock's a Unicorn Sep 10 '12 at 17:31
    
Oh, I see. I guess I meant, is there also a hidden, more specific reason than "content dispute". –  Matt Fenwick Sep 10 '12 at 17:32
    
@Matt Fenwick: Nope. If we need to be specific, we'll usually add a comment before locking a post. –  BoltClock's a Unicorn Sep 10 '12 at 17:33
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .