Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When approving a post that system thinks should not have you are presented with something along the lines of

This post has severe quality issues. It is abusive nonsense, noise, spam, blatantly off-topic or otherwise irredeemable - readers will find it offensive or repulsive rather than helpful. You should delete or recommend deletion when reviewing such posts.

Don't worry, we've already handled this post appropriately - but please take a minute to look it over closely, keeping in mind the guidance shown above.

With a "I understand" button, what about if you disagree with that assertion? Is there a way to indicate that? If there isn't perhaps one should be added so that data can be collected to improve the system.

For example:

While reviewing the low quality posts queue I got the following answer from yegor256 to to the question Amazon S3 Basic Authentication

Try (I'm a developer). It does exactly what you're looking for, free of charge.

Which I approved and the system responded that I should have recommended deletion.

From what it looks like to me the OP is asking a question about adding basic username/password authentication for an Amazon s3 hosted website and the answer is mentioning a free product/service that does what the user wants. It is true that the user answering is affiliated (they posted a disclaimer) with the product but from what I understand that is allowed.

share|improve this question
I agree. If the system can handled this post appropriately, then why have reviewers at all? And as the OP said, a "Disagree" button would provide valuable feedback to make the system better. – Drise Sep 12 '12 at 14:47
Your example is a textbook example of a low quality post... – user7116 Sep 12 '12 at 15:40
@sixlettervariables Can you elaborate why you think so? Since from what I see it's a short answer but it seems to provide exactly what the OP was looking for. – Jack Sep 12 '12 at 15:44
It should be a comment if anything, beyond the fact the question is a shopping question / gimme teh codez. – user7116 Sep 12 '12 at 15:46
@Jack Link only answers are discouraged. What if the link breaks? Then the answer basically becomes useless. Including a brief snippet about how to use the library, for example, would have made it acceptable. – Mansfield Sep 17 '13 at 15:39

Those posts are not actually flagged as low quality by the system, or voted to close. Instead, they are selected by a (seemingly) separate algorithm, and supposed to be "gotchas" introduced in the review queues to test our ability to detect low-quality or closable posts.

If you disagree with the system, post on Meta like you did. I recently did the same myself.

share|improve this answer
Still, a "Disagree" button to tell the developers "I think your gotchas selection algorithm needs improvement" with less effort would be useful, I believe. – Daniel Fischer Sep 12 '12 at 15:31
It would, but... Do you encounter such cases so often to justify a feature like that? – bfavaretto Sep 12 '12 at 17:23
@bfavaretto yes, I did. I don't review anymore though, and won't until there's a built in dispute mechanism. – jball Sep 17 '13 at 16:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .